Author Topic: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed  (Read 16274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline josh landers

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 116
  • Rating: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #45 on: March 27, 2014, 07:46:14 pm »
How about nested admins? The omni admins have control over axe wiki admins, and only axe wiki admins can create a page. Then only people who have posted in this axe parser support forum over 20 times can edit, whereas only people who have posted five times in the forum can comment and anyone can request a command or topic to be wikied.


Edited for clarity!
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 12:44:58 pm by josh landers »

Offline TIfanx1999

  • ಠ_ಠ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 6173
  • Rating: +191/-9
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #46 on: March 27, 2014, 09:26:39 pm »
If it gets to be too much of a pain for people, no one will contribute. We don't want to over complicate the process. Also, punctuation would make your post a lot clearer.

Offline josh landers

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 116
  • Rating: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #47 on: March 31, 2014, 07:12:01 pm »
Ok I edited it for clarification.  I think if we sticked a topic that linked to say a Google Doc page, then we could have a documentation presented on a familiar format. The people with access to edit the page are given so by invitation only. And the page can be read or printed freely.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #48 on: April 03, 2014, 03:03:29 pm »
How about nested admins? The omni admins have control over axe wiki admins, and only axe wiki admins can create a page. Then only people who have posted in this axe parser support forum over 20 times can edit, whereas only people who have posted five times in the forum can comment and anyone can request a command or topic to be wikied.


Edited for clarity!
I don't see why Omni admins shouldn't be able to create a page. All Omni admins should have 100% control on everything hosted on Omnimaga, so if Axe wiki admins starts breaking havoc or something or they start using atrocious grammar, then the Omni admins can walk in then fix broken pages/kick out/ban troublesome users/admins.

Else, it would be like if Eeems/Geekboy1011 had FTP access on Omni, yet couldn't edit my posts if I upload shock images.

Offline josh landers

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 116
  • Rating: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #49 on: April 04, 2014, 06:04:44 pm »
  • Omni
  •     ↓   Axe
That's what I said. .. nested.

Offline TIfanx1999

  • ಠ_ಠ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *
  • Posts: 6173
  • Rating: +191/-9
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #50 on: April 05, 2014, 09:43:27 pm »
Yes, but then you said:
Quote from: josh landers
and only axe wiki admins can create a page
which makes it seem like axe wiki admins would have greater power. It was still a bit unclear, that's all.

Offline josh landers

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 116
  • Rating: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: [Controversial] Better Axe Documentation Could Be Needed
« Reply #51 on: April 06, 2014, 01:22:26 am »
Yes, but then you said:
Quote from: josh landers
and only axe wiki admins can create a page
which makes it seem like axe wiki admins would have greater power. It was still a bit unclear, that's all.
Oh sorry I meant that omni still has power over the wiki but they woulnt need to control it directly.