Omnimaga: The Coders Of Tomorrow
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
Omnimaga: The Coders Of Tomorrow
25 May, 2013, 21:48:35 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   home   news downloads projects tutorials misc forums rules new posts irc about Login Register  
+-OmnomIRC

You must Register, be logged in and have at least 40 posts to use this shout-box! If it still doesn't show up afterward, it might be that OmnomIRC is disabled for your group or under maintenance.

Note: You can also use an IRC client like mIRC, X-Chat or Mibbit to connect to an EFnet server and #omnimaga.

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CX or Prizm? -  (Read 1173 times) Bookmark and Share
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Spyro543
LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
********
Online Online

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 21:41:01
Date Registered: 15 April, 2011, 01:42:09
Location: Ohio
Posts: 991


Topic starter
Total Post Ratings: +59

View Profile WWW
« on: 12 March, 2012, 22:40:48 »
0

I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
Logged

Spenceboy98
LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
******
Online Online

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 21:44:18
Date Registered: 17 February, 2012, 02:46:51
Location: Gaffney, South Carolina
Posts: 398


Total Post Ratings: +47

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: 12 March, 2012, 22:42:26 »
0

When I was deciding, people prompted me to get a Prizm. So I did.
Logged

DERSH IMPERSHIBER!!!

NerdTests.com says I'm a Nerd King.  Click here to take the Nerd Test, get geeky images and jokes, and talk to others on the nerd forum!
ruler501
Crazy Freshman
LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
***********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 04:21:44
Date Registered: 08 November, 2010, 02:32:33
Location: In a cave with two spots of light and lots of meat
Posts: 2382


Total Post Ratings: +49

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 12 March, 2012, 22:43:58 »
0

I would say prizm because casio isnt trying to screw over its dev community like ti is
Logged


Spoiler for "Projects":
My current games I am working on our:
  I might have an improved C version of this somewhere...
pSDL too lazy too make a userbar so I'll just link to the topic i update routinely http://www.omnimaga.org/index.php?board=146.0
Spoiler for "Misc images of test things":
NerdTests.com says I'm a Dorky Nerd God.  Click here to take the Nerd Test, get geeky images and jokes, and talk to others on the nerd forum!My computer geek score is greater than 100% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!"<br />[url=http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_personality.php?ref=42769
[/url]
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/CS/M/S d- s++: a---- C++ UL++ P+ L++ E---- W++ N o? K- w-- o? !M V?
PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP++ t 5? X R tv-- b+++ DI+ D+ G++ e- h! !r y

------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
"KnifeOn!  Apply directly to the forehead!  KnifeOn is available without a prescription at retailers nationwide."
Lionel Debroux
LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
**********
Online Online

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 21:45:23
Date Registered: 17 December, 2009, 09:37:25
Location: France
Posts: 1854

Total Post Ratings: +208

View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: 12 March, 2012, 22:50:50 »
0

The Nspire has more raw power, but is a closed platform, and TI is trying every trick to close users' right to run whatever software they want on the platforms they own; the Prizm is more open, but has lower raw power.

Also noteworthy is the fact that the Nspire has a CAS version, while the Prizm doesn't (at the time of this writing, and AFAICT): if you're not taking any silly exams which forbid usage of the CAS, it might tip your balance Smiley
« Last Edit: 12 March, 2012, 22:51:35 by Lionel Debroux » Logged

Member of the TI-Chess Team.
Co-maintainer of GCC4TI (GCC4TI online documentation), TILP and TIEmu.
Co-admin of TI-Planet.
Dingus
LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
****
Offline Offline

Last Login: 22 May, 2013, 16:24:19
Date Registered: 21 March, 2011, 01:01:58
Posts: 129

Total Post Ratings: +13

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: 12 March, 2012, 23:06:55 »
0

I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
That's a no brainier.  Get the Prizm.  Two thing are clear. First, beyond a doubt TI will continue to make life difficult for developers so the programmers will continue to migrate to Casio.  Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.
Logged
adriweb
Editor
LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: 23 May, 2013, 12:02:44
Date Registered: 13 April, 2011, 18:42:59
Location: South of France
Posts: 1197


Total Post Ratings: +185

View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: 12 March, 2012, 23:25:57 »
+1

I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
That's a no brainier.  Get the Prizm.  Two thing are clear. First, beyond a doubt TI will continue to make life difficult for developers so the programmers will continue to migrate to Casio.  Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.

While the beginning can be true objectively the end of your sentence isn't right at all for me.

Casio isn't teacher oriented and doesn't make a good job at getting popular among teachers & schools, and for math etc. the TI devices will always be better.
And don't forget that's what calculators are for in the first place. If TI is restricting native programming capabilities in the Nspire, which is sad for the community, it's also very good for the teachers, for example, so it has a bad effect on some people (the community who wants to have native programming) (which isn't very important for TI for an educational point of view), and a good one for the 99,99% rest of their customers : teachers & schools.


Also, CASIO-fans say programming is better on the CX, but Ndless has proven otherwise, guys.
Jailbreaking needed or not, the final result is there Smiley
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
« Last Edit: 12 March, 2012, 23:28:54 by adriweb » Logged


TI-Planet.org co-admin.
TI-Nspire Lua programming : Tutorials  |  API Documentation
cyanophycean314
LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: 03 May, 2013, 19:28:34
Date Registered: 07 December, 2011, 02:44:32
Location: Somewhere?
Posts: 363


Total Post Ratings: +42

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: 13 March, 2012, 01:58:06 »
0

Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.

Do you really need TI-CARES? You have Omni!

Personally, I slant to the CX. More power, GBC emulator, nDoom, more storage space. ndless allows native code and there is Lua natively available (with new improvements in 3.2).

TI attacking programmability? Who updates their OS anyway? As long as they don't keep on enticing people with their new features Tongue The physics engine is looking quite impressive, and x= graphing may draw teachers to update...
Logged

BalancedFury
LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: 08 July, 2012, 18:33:02
Date Registered: 08 September, 2011, 02:29:48
Location: At home :D
Posts: 722


Total Post Ratings: +27

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: 13 March, 2012, 02:03:14 »
0

^^^ exactly
Logged

Antonio Nam = DualBLDR = Tony Arthur... U choose!





JOIN THE PETITION TO ADD THIS EMOTICON!!
[|:{P ------->


Yo dawg I herd u lost the game game so I coded the game game in your calc so you can lose the game game while you code your code about losing the game game.
Lionel Debroux
LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
**********
Online Online

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 21:45:23
Date Registered: 17 December, 2009, 09:37:25
Location: France
Posts: 1854

Total Post Ratings: +208

View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: 13 March, 2012, 08:04:28 »
0

Quote
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
That's silly, Adriweb. Lua can in no way be qualified "native", and its performance is easily more than 10 times slower than native code (it's a purely interpreted language).

Quote
Who updates their OS anyway?
Users buying brand-new calculators. They quickly become a majority soon after brand-new calculators hit the shelves...
Logged

Member of the TI-Chess Team.
Co-maintainer of GCC4TI (GCC4TI online documentation), TILP and TIEmu.
Co-admin of TI-Planet.
adriweb
Editor
LV9 Veteran (Next: 1337)
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: 23 May, 2013, 12:02:44
Date Registered: 13 April, 2011, 18:42:59
Location: South of France
Posts: 1197


Total Post Ratings: +185

View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: 13 March, 2012, 08:34:51 »
0

Quote
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
That's silly, Adriweb. Lua can in no way be qualified "native", and its performance is easily more than 10 times slower than native code (it's a purely interpreted language).

Oops yeah, I meant native as in "without any modification like Jailbraking", but you know what I meant.
And yea, obviously, it's slower than C/ASM, that goes without saying.
But it's still inifinitely faster than Basic...
Logged


TI-Planet.org co-admin.
TI-Nspire Lua programming : Tutorials  |  API Documentation
Jim Bauwens
Lua! Nspire! Linux!
Editor
LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 19:28:54
Date Registered: 28 February, 2011, 22:32:12
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1733


Total Post Ratings: +180

View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: 13 March, 2012, 09:51:56 »
0

I personally (although I never tried a Prizm) prefer a CX.
One of the main reason it because hardware wise it beats the nspire -- but of course you will only be able to take advantage of it with ndless.
But I don't mind to wait for new version of Ndless, and I know that ExtendeD is dedicated to it. There has been an Ndless version for every OS IIRC.
And Lua is growing bigger and better, both by input of the community and TI.

As others have said, the CX (with/without CAS) just beats the Prizm in calculator terms.
Logged

Stefan Bauwens
Creator of Myst 89 - סטיבן
LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
**********
Online Online

Gender: Male
Last Login: Today at 21:42:55
Date Registered: 25 February, 2011, 15:41:10
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1729


Total Post Ratings: +132

View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: 13 March, 2012, 10:32:11 »
0

Maybe my article could help you?
http://www.omnimaga.org/index.php?topic=12885.msg236284#msg236284
Logged

Dingus
LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
****
Offline Offline

Last Login: 22 May, 2013, 16:24:19
Date Registered: 21 March, 2011, 01:01:58
Posts: 129

Total Post Ratings: +13

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: 14 March, 2012, 00:33:28 »
0


 Super article Stefan!

Having read all the posts in a very unbiased manner, I think what it boils down to is that if the new TI os cannot be hacked and a new version of Ndless be created for it, anyone that has supported ti by buying their products has no grounds for complaint.  You got what you deserve.   
Logged
Reo
LV3 Member (Next: 100)
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Last Login: Yesterday at 18:23:11
Date Registered: 28 September, 2011, 03:40:56
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 63

Total Post Ratings: +14

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: 14 March, 2012, 00:48:10 »
0

I think what it boils down to is that if the new TI os cannot be hacked and a new version of Ndless be created for it, anyone that has supported ti by buying their products has no grounds for complaint.  You got what you deserve.
Nobody can make such claims yet because the firmware isn't out. It's extremely possible that there's still an exploit waiting to be discovered. Beyond that, the "you got what you deserve" comment is extremely harsh. Nobody "deserved" this; there was a risk taken, but don't rub our losses in our faces just because you support Casio.
Logged
Dingus
LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
****
Offline Offline

Last Login: 22 May, 2013, 16:24:19
Date Registered: 21 March, 2011, 01:01:58
Posts: 129

Total Post Ratings: +13

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: 14 March, 2012, 04:51:27 »
0


Nobody can make such claims yet because the firmware isn't out. It's extremely possible that there's still an exploit waiting to be discovered. Beyond that, the "you got what you deserve" comment is extremely harsh. Nobody "deserved" this; there was a risk taken, but don't rub our losses in our faces just because you support Casio.
[/quote]
I'm sorry Reo, I really wasn't trying to rub your losses in your faces, but the time is over due for everyone to understand that you can't have it both ways. If you really object to the way TI treats this community then show it by not supporting TI and their products.  On the other hand, how does anyone have any right to complain about the way TI treats us if they are going to support ti and their products?  I read all this moaning and groaning about how TI is doing this terrible thing with their next os update and then there is all this support for their products.  Thats rediculous.  If you don't like what TI is doing, then stop supporting them or, if you choose to support them, stop complaining.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Powered by MySQL Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Powered by PHP
Page created in 0.342 seconds with 29 queries.
Skin by DJ Omnimaga edited from SMF default theme with the help of tr1p1ea.
All programs, games and songs avaliable on this website are property of their respective owners.
Best viewed in Opera, Firefox, Chrome and Safari with a resolution of 1024x768 or above.