Screenshots

[Munchor]

Graviter, can you give me the code of the lose screenie? When you lose, the screen plays a simple animation, can you give me the code for it? Thanks.

[leafy]

The static code? (I've changed it since then)
It intentionally corrupts the buffer, so:

For(B,0,10 //How many iterations
For(A,0,767
rand^256->{A+L6}
End
End

EDIT: Credit for the code goes to tloz

[z80man]

The static code? (I've changed it since then)
It intentionally corrupts the buffer, so:

For(B,0,10 //How many iterations
For(A,0,767
rand^256->{A+L6}
End
End

EDIT: Credit for the code goes to tloz

I don't now if this would be any faster (or even possible as I'm not much of an axe programmer, but could you try)

Code: Select All | Copy To Clipboard

1 2 3 4 5 6

For(B,0,10 For(A,0,767 rand ->{A+L6} A+1->A End End

[ztrumpet]

Let's see, this would probably go faster: (I think it works. )
For(B,0,10)
  0->A
  While -766
    rand->{A+L1}^r+1->A
  End
End

[z80man]

Let's see, this would probably go faster: (I think it works. )
For(B,0,10)
  0->A
  While -766
    rand->{A+L1}^r+1->A
  End
End

Now I'm not really sure, but isn't rand a 16 bit integer

[calc84maniac]

Let's see, this would probably go faster: (I think it works. )
For(B,0,10)
  0->A
  While -766
    rand->{A+L1}^r+1->A
  End
End

Now I'm not really sure, but isn't rand a 16 bit integer

Yes, but this is doing a 16-bit store. But, there's a little problem, because L1 is being added in each loop iteration. This might work better:
rand->{A+L1}^r+1-L1->A

[ztrumpet]

Ah, yes.  I forgot about that. 

[Mohammad]

Dude that is awesome!!!!!!!!!!!

[ZippyDee]

Yeah that static looks really awesome. Man, this whole thing looks awesome!

[leafy]

I've updated the first post with some of the more recent screenshots, so any visitors coming here will see the new version as opposed to the old I still have to make captions for the newer screenshots, though.

[DJ Omnimaga]

That reminds me... if put in the downloads section, should the old version be included too? Some levels seemed quite different and even  though the new version was improved a lot, some people might still want to play the old one too.

Also you almost have 1337 posts

[leafy]

The thing is, I don't think I have the old versions anymore - they were all lost and I don't recall making any backups. Even if there were backups, they'd probably take me millenia to find

[DJ Omnimaga]

Aren't the old builds attached to some Omni posts?

If they're gone too then I guess you could just include the latest version there, since I don't think it's in the downloads section. (or at least linked to ticalc.org archives)