Omnimaga
Calculator Community => Casio Calculators => Topic started by: DJ Omnimaga on January 17, 2011, 03:24:17 pm
-
I think it would be nice if we posted the version number of our OSes here (NOT the actual OSes):
On my Prizm this is what I got:
OS
01.01.0200
Add-In Applications
(I deleted all of them :P)
Message
English 01.00
Español 01.00
Deutsch 01.00
Français 01.00
Portuguès 01.00
中文 01.00
Menu
English 01.00
中文 01.00
On a side note, where can we download a new OS? ???
-
OS
01.02.0200
Add-In Applications
Geometry 01.00
Picture Plot 01.00
Conversion 01.00
Message
English 01.01
Español 01.01
Deutsch 01.01
Français 01.01
Portuguès 01.01
中文 01.01
Menu
English 01.01
中文 01.01
-
Interesting that there are already new OSes. I wonder why they aren't available on Casio site, though. X.x
-
Currently I got what DJ has.
-
Same as DJ
@Qwerty does your version of the OS have the same bugs as DJ's version.
-
No, my version doesn't have the Locate bug.
Here's the file to test it if you would like:
-
Wow Casio actually gets rid of the bugs in their calcs. Casio 1. TI 0.
-
Wow nice indeed. The only downside is how they failed to actually release the new OS to allow people with the buggy one to upgrade, though. <_<
Also Qwerty.55 got the Prizm emulator trial software on his calc CD, but not me. D:
-
Wow nice indeed. The only downside is how they failed to actually release the new OS to allow people with the buggy one to upgrade, though. <_<
Also Qwerty.55 got the Prizm emulator trial software on his calc CD, but not me. D:
What!! is it online yet. :o
* z80man is jealous
Edit: darn't Casio hasn't posted it yet.
-
I doesn't have it either...
-
Wow nice indeed. The only downside is how they failed to actually release the new OS to allow people with the buggy one to upgrade, though. <_<
Also Qwerty.55 got the Prizm emulator trial software on his calc CD, but not me. D:
What!! is it online yet. :o
* z80man is jealous
Edit: darn't Casio hasn't posted it yet.
Sadly it's not online yet, same for the new OS version. I hope Casio make them public, else it will suck if many people are stuck with an early buggy version for a while. It could be a pre-release of the calc that I got, but again it could be an early release that quickly got updated a few weeks later.
-
(http://img.removedfromgame.com/imgs/GIG.GIF)
:p
-
Okay I'm not that good at math yet. I have know idea what that is supposed to do. :P
-
What is the screenshot supposed to show? A bug? ???
Also you can make color screenshots with CalcCapture. Quite ironically I used CalcCapture to create an animated screenshot of itself. :P
-
It's supposed to find the area under that curve, but I couldn't get it to work properly.
-
Did you try putting parentheses around everything between the integral symbol and the dx?
-
Well, it's not really important. I just wrote something down. The important part is that an emulator exists. The bad news is that it doesn't even try to emulate the hardware. It's all software emulation.
-
Did you try running the overclock app on it.
-
Not yet. I'm scared of my own code :P
-
I mean on the emulator. It should be harmless right.
-
Well, if it allowed you to import programs. It doesn't.
-
Does it still come with the add in apps preloaded onto the calc.
-
Yes.
-
The FX-9860G emu was not even compatible with 3rd-party add-ins, if I remember, and it did not emulate the hardware, so I'm not surprised the Prizm one doesn't, either. TI did the same thing with TI-SmartView (for the 83+) and the Nspire software, and Flash Debugger was pretty unreliable..
-
Really? I'm pretty sure apps were allowed on TI-Smartview.
-
The FX-9860G emu was not even compatible with 3rd-party add-ins
But the fx-9860G/GII manager emulator does support add-ins.
Too bad you have to pay for it.
-
Yes, the so-called "Manager" software does support add-ins.
-
The FX-9860G emu was not even compatible with 3rd-party add-ins
But the fx-9860G/GII manager emulator does support add-ins.
Too bad you have to pay for it.
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.Really? I'm pretty sure apps were allowed on TI-Smartview.
I guess the only way to make sure would be to try, then. I heard it barely had any assembly support and it did not even try to emulate the hardware.
-
Early versions of the fx-9860G(SD) emulator have been distributed freely by Casio, and didn't include add-in support.
As you have to pay for the newer versions, I think you'll understand ;)
-
Oh I see, I didn't even know it ever got distributed for free before.
-
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.
Programs doing direct hardware access are most likely going to crash.
-
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.
Programs doing direct hardware access are most likely going to crash.
Not really. I do almost all of my z80 asm programming without the use of any system calls. It's kinda my philosphy. Pure z80 code without a hint of TiOS. Plus it"s a lot faster too.
-
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.
Programs doing direct hardware access are most likely going to crash.
Not really. I do almost all of my z80 asm programming without the use of any system calls. It's kinda my philosphy. Pure z80 code without a hint of TiOS. Plus it"s a lot faster too.
And will work on pretty much any OS. I used system calls a lot for debugging, until I learned that you could use a spare ram page and log stuff.
-
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.
Programs doing direct hardware access are most likely going to crash.
Not really. I do almost all of my z80 asm programming without the use of any system calls. It's kinda my philosphy. Pure z80 code without a hint of TiOS. Plus it"s a lot faster too.
Directly accessing the hardware will probably crash an emulator :P
-
Really? Some people told me 3rd-party add-ins such as Kucalc's overclocking program did not work in it, same for that raycaster someone (him?) wrote a few years ago.
Programs doing direct hardware access are most likely going to crash.
Not really. I do almost all of my z80 asm programming without the use of any system calls. It's kinda my philosphy. Pure z80 code without a hint of TiOS. Plus it"s a lot faster too.
Directly accessing the hardware will probably crash an emulator :P
That also depends on the emulator. A good emulator will emulate the hardware exactly. This helps debug qwirks and such that the device has.
-
^This. After all, if the emu emulates the hardware perfectly, it will run any OS or file supported by the real machine.