Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Runer112 | 75 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
2 | JWinslow23 | 90 | 7/29/2014 11:43:19 AM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | willrandship | 147 | 7/29/2014 12:51:41 AM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Juju | 115 | 7/29/2014 2:47:50 AM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Jens_K | 132 | 8/1/2014 6:59:33 AM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | 3298 | 59.5 | 7/31/2014 5:18:48 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | willrandship | 98 | 7/31/2014 2:15:31 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | 3298 | 122 | 8/3/2014 6:16:11 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
2 | bb010g | 216 | 8/2/2014 7:11:01 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Runer112 | 16 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Runer112 | 33 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Runer112 | 172 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
2 | 3298 | 185 | 8/3/2014 6:16:11 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | Runer112 | 58 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | User | Size | Date | Code |
1 | 3298 | 179 | 8/3/2014 6:16:11 PM | Spoiler For Spoiler: |
Rank | Lang | User | Size | Date |
1 | CJam | Runer112 | 16 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM |
2 | Golfscript | Runer112 | 33 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM |
3 | TI-83+ z80 | Runer112 | 58 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM |
4 | SysRPL | 3298 | 59.5 (don't ask me why; I'm going off of what he said) | 7/31/2014 5:18:48 PM |
5 | TI-83+ BASIC | Runer112 | 75 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM |
6 | Ruby | Juju | 98 | 7/30/2014 12:01:58 AM |
7 | Perl | willrandship | 98 | 7/31/2014 2:15:31 PM |
8 | Haskell | 3298 | 122 | 8/3/2014 6:16:11 PM |
9 | Nspire Lua | Jens_K | 132 | 8/1/2014 6:59:33 AM |
10 | Python2 | willrandship | 147 | 7/29/2014 12:51:41 AM |
11 | Java | Runer112 | 172 | 8/3/2014 2:17:19 PM |
12 | XTend | 3298 | 179 | 8/3/2014 6:16:11 PM |
By the way, if your language does not support underscores (ONLY if it does not) you may use a decimal [.] symbol instead.
Now everything's more complicated :\ stupid 2-byte tokens.It's not complicated at all. I did it in 122 bytes. The prime factorization code was no problem. Neither was the binary conversion. It assumes anything 1 and under are valid.
So, I have a couple of questions.I actually don't know the rules on valid input. My 90 byte solution assumes input is any integer. Ask willrandship for confirmation, I don't know.
Can we assume the input is at least 2? Otherwise, largest prime factor doesn't actually exist.
Also, can my output have a trailing space? That makes things easier in TI-BASIC because of silly string limitations.
If yes to both of these, then I have a 67-byte TI-BASIC solution.
So, I have a couple of questions.
Can we assume the input is at least 2? Otherwise, largest prime factor doesn't actually exist.
Also, can my output have a trailing space? That makes things easier in TI-BASIC because of silly string limitations.
If yes to both of these, then I have a 67-byte TI-BASIC solution.
I don't know about pressing enter after every key. I'm pretty sure I specified a string for input...:P Better pull out that sub( command.And I do have a string for input. It's just, for displaying the final numbers...
Aligning to the right is fine, as long as it's vertical.
FWIW I have a 75 byte perl version.
SysRPL:evillaugh: That half-byte comes from the 4-bit processor SysRPL is designed for. Many things there have odd sizes, and when you have an odd number of nibbles, you get ... you guessed it, half bytes.
Rank User Size Date 1 3298 59.5 (don't ask me why; I'm going off of what he said) 7/31/2014 5:18:48 PM