Calculator Community > Community Contests

[ENDED] Code Golf - The Reboot #5

<< < (3/4) > >>

Runer112:

--- Quote from: JWinslow23 on June 30, 2015, 11:31:12 pm ---And the minimum (also for determining them in the first place; 1 digit numbers are trivially Keith numbers) is 10. Which is not a Keith number (1+0, 0+1, 1+1, 1+2, 2+3, 3+5, 5+8...).

--- End quote ---

I meant is there a required point at least through which the program must behave correctly? Does an entry have to work for all inputs up to 100? 1000? 1000000?

c4ooo:
If anyone want to know why there was some secrecy between me and JWinslow last night it was because i asked him if i could cross post this to Code golf on stackoverflow, and he said yes, except he did  not any 1 to find out. I ended up not doing it because there already is a keith testing challenge on the stackoverflow network :P

JWinslow23:

--- Quote from: Runer112 on July 01, 2015, 09:06:48 am ---
--- Quote from: JWinslow23 on June 30, 2015, 11:31:12 pm ---And the minimum (also for determining them in the first place; 1 digit numbers are trivially Keith numbers) is 10. Which is not a Keith number (1+0, 0+1, 1+1, 1+2, 2+3, 3+5, 5+8...).

--- End quote ---

I meant is there a required point at least through which the program must behave correctly? Does an entry have to work for all inputs up to 100? 1000? 1000000?

--- End quote ---
The program should work up to 5752090994058710841670361653731519, or the maximum the language allows (e.g. for TI-BASIC, up to 14 digit numbers are perfectly acceptable).

JWinslow23:
Bump.

Just a reminder, the contest ends officially at midnight EST tomorrow!

I have a (non-official, non-counted-at-all-but-I'll-still-show-it-at-the-end) entry in Golfscript that measures out to 40 bytes. A challenge for the next day...can YOU do better?

JWinslow23:
The contest is over! I hope everybody had fun with this challenge! :D

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version