Is the language syntax identical to TI-BASIC? Someone did a FreeBASIC language similar to 83+ BASIC before, but there were some differences and it seemed ASCII-art-only.It is not identical to TI-Basic; for example, to get an element of a two-dimensional array, you use [A](3,4) in TI-Basic, for example, but a[2][3] in Amethyst. Another aspect is the first-class functions and lists, and Amethyst introduces the \ amd % operators. Built-in commands have a different syntax as well: you write Disp "HELLO" in TI-Basic but $:hluna("hello") in Amethyst.
Sounds interesting :)I agree, but what do you like about this? What could use some improvement?