Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 06, 2007, 06:00:00 am
If there is a fix for this could someone direct me to it?
It only do that in Windows XP
Post by: spengo on September 06, 2007, 09:21:00 am
Post by: Delnar_Ersike on September 06, 2007, 12:59:00 pm
Post by: nitacku on September 06, 2007, 01:29:00 pm
It was really weird. It would do the same thing that you described; open the save dialog, and then close about 2 seconds after I click on anything. I'm not sure what is causing it. It only used to happen on that one program for me.
Could it be using .net framework? Maybe there is an error in the .net framework.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 06, 2007, 05:39:00 pm
Post by: Delnar_Ersike on September 07, 2007, 04:04:00 am
| QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 6 Sep, 2007, 21:39) |
| maybe its that, i dont think its ram tho cuz i have 1 GB and it was meant for this mobo, and windows install is only 2 month old, I had this problem with my previous one as well as on my old pentium II back then |
Really? Is there anything common between those three computers other than their operating system?
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 07, 2007, 10:29:00 am
Post by: JincS on September 07, 2007, 04:47:00 pm
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 07, 2007, 05:19:00 pm
Post by: Halifax on September 07, 2007, 06:02:00 pm
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 07, 2007, 06:05:00 pm
else its my comp or windows install, but it would be weird because all my previous xp install did that
Post by: Halifax on September 07, 2007, 06:07:00 pm
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 07, 2007, 06:08:00 pm
Post by: necro on September 07, 2007, 07:24:00 pm
Post by: Delnar_Ersike on September 08, 2007, 06:34:00 am
| QUOTE (necro @ 7 Sep, 2007, 23:24) |
| Or perhaps a better set of programing standards that adress issues like these. Besides, xp is infinitely nicer than vista...(*cries* because higher end pc with vista preloaded sucks more than several year old xp laptop) |
I guess that is why Dell has become kind of popular these days (they can pre-load XP instead of Vista in about 66% of their computers, as well as pre-loading Ubuntu in some of their desktops)...
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 08, 2007, 10:21:00 am
Post by: Fallen Ghost on September 08, 2007, 11:02:00 am
Post by: Netham45 on September 08, 2007, 03:12:00 pm
) the XP one had major issues with my motherboard even on a new install. Vista gets better FPS in games, and everything than the XP install did.
Post by: rivereye on September 08, 2007, 04:35:00 pm
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 08, 2007, 05:58:00 pm
Post by: spengo on September 08, 2007, 07:11:00 pm
| QUOTE (rivereye @ 9 Sep, 2007, 3:35) |
| there is nothing wrong with Vista. I am a Vista user, and I like it. |
*cough*
... okay, I gave Vista a go TWICE now, and both times have been very disappointed. There is a severe dearth of good drivers for pretty much any piece of hardware that I own, half the programs I like to use crash to desktop or do other random things, and all games suffer huge drops in performance. Oh and have I mentioned there complete and utter lack of opengl support?! I gave it a go when it first came out and it sucked, and then when I built my new ownage computer I tried vista again on my windows partition. I figured hell, it's been over 6 months, they should have decent drivers by now and have worked out all the bugs right? WRONG. So far as I can tell, Vista's one good thing is that the stock theme looks pretty. Anyways, I shall never touch it again. :knight:
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 09, 2007, 12:27:00 am
Post by: Delnar_Ersike on September 09, 2007, 06:09:00 am
| QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 9 Sep, 2007, 4:27) |
| usually it take around 2-3 years formost programs to be compatible with a new OS. *cough*TI-Connect*cough* And i heard lot of people had problems with game being slower on Vista than XP. Maybe it's because of the high memory requirements though. |
But the problem is that the jump is so huge between Vista and XP. While XP Professional can run at 20 MB RAM and an 8 Mhz processor (even if it is very slow), Vista can't run properly at 512 MB RAM.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on September 09, 2007, 09:43:00 am
QuoteBegin-wikipedia+-->
| QUOTE (wikipedia) |
June 1985 Windows 1.01 Unsupported August 1986 Windows 1.03 Unsupported December 1987 Windows 2.03 Unsupported June 1988 Windows 2.1 Unsupported May 1990 Windows 3.0 Unsupported April 1992 Windows 3.1 Unsupported as of December 31, 2001[19] January 1994 Windows 3.2 Unsupported October 1992 Windows For Workgroups 3.1 Unsupported August 1993 Windows NT 3.1 Unsupported November 1993 Windows For Workgroups 3.11 Unsupported September 1994 Windows NT 3.5 Unsupported November 1994 Windows NT 3.51 Unsupported[19] August 1995 Windows 95 Unsupported as of December 31, 2001[19] September 1996 Windows NT 4.0 Unsupported as of December 31, 2004[19] June 1998 Windows 98 Unsupported as of July 11, 2006[20] February 2000 Windows 2000 Extended Support until June 13, 2010[21] July 2000 Windows Me Unsupported as of July 11, 2006[20] October 2001 Windows XP Unsupported for RTM as of September 30, 2004 and for SP1 as of October 10, 2006[22] Current for SP2 April 2003 Windows Server 2003/Windows XP x64 Edition Unsupported for RTM, SP1 and SP1a Current for SP2 January 2007 Windows Vista Current 2010 or later (planned) Windows 7 (Formerly codenamed Blackcomb, now Vienna) Future release |