TI-Nspire CX/CX CAS | HP Prime | |
CPU | 150 MHz ARM (overclockable around 230) | 400 MHz ARM (some sources say 266 MHz) |
RAM | 64 MB | 32 MB* |
Flash | 100 MB* | 256 MB* |
Input | Keypad+Touchpad | Keypad+Touchscreen |
Programmability | TI-BASIC (on-calc), Lua**, ASM, C | HP PPL (on-calc), potential future ASM/C support if community finds out how |
Screen | 320x240, 65536 colors | 320x240, 32768 colors |
US Price | $150 ($160 for CAS model) | $130-150 |
Schools in United States and France generally recommend the TI-Nspire series as higher-end calculators, but I heard that the HP Prime was allowed in some tests. If you plan to use the calculator for exams, it's best to ask your school if the HP Prime is allowed.
One more thing : the Nspire has an actual computer software with a simulator allowing you to work with the environment in a less restricted way (I mean, the speed is your computer's, basically.) (Also, there is an actual Nspire emulator, but not a Prime one so far)HP does provide an emulator for the Prime, like the Nspire software (with the same resolution as the Prime).
CAS is allowed on the SAT and PSAT tests. You can't use the Prime on the ACT (http://www.actstudent.org/faq/calculator.html) as of right now, but I'm hoping they change it to a calculator permitted with modification (the modification being turning the CAS off).Schools in United States and France generally recommend the TI-Nspire series as higher-end calculators, but I heard that the HP Prime was allowed in some tests. If you plan to use the calculator for exams, it's best to ask your school if the HP Prime is allowed.
When I last looked, the Prime was approved for tests like PSAT's and SAT's because there is an OS option in the Prime's options to disable ANY part of the calc for either a period of time, a password input, or both.
My teachers don't even bother anyway though...
Okay so is HP planning on adding 3D graphing in the future? Right now I am only doing simple things like trig but my teacher said to invest in a nice calculator now (he recommended the cx cas) as it will most likely last me through college. Which one is the most "future proof"?I would recommend the Prime; I trust HP to stabilize the OS and they tend to be for doing what you want, which means a better calc and tools at the end.
Ok so is there anything that the nspire cx cas has that the prime doesn't?
(For example: Nested lists are great for parsers. The Nspire doesn't have them (except in a weird workaround that isn't really efficient for normal use; I plan to make them easier to use in my preprocessor I'm building).)What's the workaround, then? Storing the list indices?
Do you mean the ClassPad II? Because I think the topic starter wants some game programmability too, which is a serious issue on the FX-cp400 (extremely slow Basic language compared to Nspire Lua and HP PPL). If you mean the Casio PRIZM (FX-cg10/20), then that has some better programmability (LuaZM, SH4 assembly and C, although all of them can only be done on the computer). The ClassPad II is also very expensive unless you live in Canada.Time to adapt the old saying.
It's not really "Death to Casio!"; it's more "Casio, get your stuff together!"Do you mean the ClassPad II? Because I think the topic starter wants some game programmability too, which is a serious issue on the FX-cp400 (extremely slow Basic language compared to Nspire Lua and HP PPL). If you mean the Casio PRIZM (FX-cg10/20), then that has some better programmability (LuaZM, SH4 assembly and C, although all of them can only be done on the computer). The ClassPad II is also very expensive unless you live in Canada.Time to adapt the old saying.
1990 - 2007: "Death to Casio! Long live TI!"
2007 - 2013: "Death to TI! Long live Casio!"
2013 - now: "Death to Casio! Long live HP!"
Do you mean the ClassPad II? Because I think the topic starter wants some game programmability too, which is a serious issue on the FX-cp400 (extremely slow Basic language compared to Nspire Lua and HP PPL). If you mean the Casio PRIZM (FX-cg10/20), then that has some better programmability (LuaZM, SH4 assembly and C, although all of them can only be done on the computer). The ClassPad II is also very expensive unless you live in Canada.
The issue with the ClassPad though is the speed. If you run a program and have to wait 6 minutes 40 seconds for your result when the TI-Nspire CAS and HP Prime can do it in a single second or less, there is a serious problem. Also, when I run a program then exit, there is a 30-60 seconds loading before I can even do anything else.
Graphing, on the other hand, isn't that slow, and I love the touchscreen for it. I don't understand why they decided to go with a resistive screen and a stylus, though. We're in 2014, not 1999.
Casio really need to get their act up together and optimize the Basic interpreter. There's no reason why a 50-200 MHz calculator takes 13 times times longer to execute a program than on a 15 MHz one. That said, rewriting the basic interpreter all from scratch would result into a buggy one until they finally found all the bugs, as seen on the new HP calcs.
That said, I and many other people here are kinda biased because Omnimaga is a site almost entirely dedicated to game development and gaming and people here happen to prefer TI-BASIC-like languages, so they'll generally choose the calc which has the fastest one.
It depends. From what I remember, the default speed of the older models is 90 MHz in OS 2.0 or lower and 120 in newer OSes and you can increase it to 150 with Nover. For the color models, I think it's around 150 MHz by default and the max possible is around 226, but some people can use theirs around 246 with no problem.
What the heck? O.O
(Btw it's not me. Not sure why someone would try to impersonate me and praise the Nspire under my name ._.)
Regarding #1, I noticed that in Ndless programs, the touchpad "mouse" is much more responsive than in the OS. At first I was worried that my touchpad was defective, but then realized it was the OS fault. Basically, the mouse isn't very responsive and when moving the cursor around, there's a lot of stuttering, not to mention that in Lua programs it sometimes flickers like mad.What the heck? O.O
(Btw it's not me. Not sure why someone would try to impersonate me and praise the Nspire under my name ._.)
Probably the NSA or perhaps TI? :-)
To get back to the subject,
Personally I'm a little disappointed with my TI Nspire CX CAS.
I guess I should have known better, I did try it for some hours in the windows emulator. But the win emulator did hide two of the major flaws:
1. I used my mouse, not the calculators lacking trackpad
2. the stupid colour of "selected text", invisible!
The calculator is by no means "bad" or subpar, but not as great as I had wished.
Since I don't want to buy 3 calculators this spring, I'm trying to decide between the Classpad II and Prime. So let's keep the thread going!
Happy Friday everyone!