Omnimaga

General Discussion => Other Discussions => Humour and Jokes => Topic started by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 11:24:12 am

Title: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 11:24:12 am

DOOOOOD THIS PROGRAM IS THE GREATEST L@@K MUST DOWNLOAD!!! A-1 SUPER!! YESSSSS! CLICK ON ELITE.EXE TO PLAY! VERSION == NEWER FIX BUG!!>!!!

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 11, 2010, 11:34:25 am

I can't win... ;_;
/me loses the game

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 11:49:19 am

C# is now officially the best language evar

(joking of course ;))

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 11, 2010, 11:59:26 am

Um, something seems to be wrong... I've played five times now and every time the number wasn't between 1 and 30 D:
Is this unbeatable? D:

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 12:15:29 pm

no, it is just awesome! you must stink at guessing

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 11, 2010, 12:34:30 pm

Yes. The complexity of WFRNG is overwhelming.

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 12:52:44 pm

it has been known to cause massive headaches, so be careful young padiwan

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 11, 2010, 01:01:54 pm

My brain hurts now D:

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on October 11, 2010, 02:35:23 pm

Yeah I tried from 1 to 30 and never won, also it crashed if I typed something else than a number x.x

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: Runer112 on October 11, 2010, 04:33:51 pm

Code: [Select]

int ntg = myRandom.Next();
I believe the problem exists with this line, as you don't specify a range to choose the number from. Without specifying a range, ntg will just equal a random 32-bit integer, and the probability of that being in the range of 1-30 is about 0.0000007%.

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 11, 2010, 04:40:01 pm

yikes, I did not see that O_o

FIXED! NOW D0000D WFRNG IS DE BESTEST OF C#

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 12, 2010, 09:39:08 am

Still doesn't work. D:

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s183/JosJuice/random116.png (http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s183/JosJuice/random116.png)

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 12, 2010, 03:40:14 pm

err, yeah, something went wrong with the upload, ok, it works now :D

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: Deep Toaster on October 13, 2010, 11:40:11 am

I thought this was a website at first XD

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on October 13, 2010, 01:57:56 pm

Yeah I got confused at first too because of the .net. Also I like how this version if like 50 times smaller than the one already on ticalc.org :P

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 14, 2010, 03:39:26 pm

lol, it is? really?


OMG! 666'TH POST: I AM EVVVVVVVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLllllllllllllllllllllll

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on October 14, 2010, 05:05:19 pm

Well, the original Windows WFRNG on ticalc.org is 200 KB large x.x

Also congrats on evilness.

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 14, 2010, 05:14:58 pm

lulz, thanks :D

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 15, 2010, 11:12:25 pm

bump

anyone unlock the secrets of nick's ticalc password?

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: Deep Toaster on October 15, 2010, 11:37:17 pm

It's *********!

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: qazz42 on October 16, 2010, 09:11:04 am

D:
/me runs

Title: Re: wacky fun numbar generator.net!!!!!!
Post by: JosJuice on October 16, 2010, 09:13:49 am

I thought it was **********, not ********* ;_;