Ok, what about 2.0.1 and 2.1? What I am also curious about is if the interpreter is actually present in the OS. Maybe the file format won't be read, but the language is there?No, it's not present.
I also wonder if Lua programs for the Nspire will be compatible with the TI-Nspire CX?I would assume so, since they even work in the computer software.
After seeing "setColor" and "isColor" functions, I'm positive that Lua will work on the CX.
Once Ndless works on OS 3.0, enhancing the Lua API will be quite easy./me hopes Ndless 3.0 is possible :D
Once Ndless works on OS 3.0...
I don't think it's a good idea to attempt Ndless for OS 3.0 right now. TI just gave us Lua tools in hopes we would just use those for everything and drop the hacking. Now that they at least pretend to like us, we should at least pretend to be interested in what they gave to us. If we open up Ndless 3.0 for C and ASM development on the CX, then they might just suspend the Lua tools that many people here use. I don't think it's fair to them if their tools get taken away, since then they have no purpose for their calculator.is this posted in the wrong thread or am i blind?
Once Ndless works on OS 3.0...
You've found a way?
Well, if we happened to use something like Lua to help us make Ndless, they would take it away just due to that. They would rather no programming than completely unbounded programming, I'm sure.Maybe, maybe not.
TI just gave us Lua tools in hopes we would just use those for everything and drop the hacking.If that's what they're hoping, well, they're living in a fantasy world of delusion ;)
Now that they at least pretend to like us,Well, they had little choice but releasing the documentation and tool, after a) most of the documentation had already been found through reverse-engineering and b) the documentation and tool was involuntarily leaked on the website of a third party ;)
we should at least pretend to be interested in what they gave to us.Speaking for myself, I pretend that Lua is definitely a way forward from the sub-par BASIC (which, in some areas, doesn't even have the functionality provided by the TI-81 20 years ago), but I'm not very interested in programming in Lua. For my own purposes, I remain interested mainly in C/ASM programming.
If we open up Ndless 3.0 for C and ASM development on the CX, then they might just suspend the Lua tools that many people here use. I don't think it's fair to them if their tools get taken away, since then they have no purpose for their calculator.Besides users and programmers, teachers are warming up to Lua. By now, the backlash for suppressing Lua from the OS as a whole would be huge... Teachers could always try to blame "hackers", but would that bode well with users ?