Author Topic: Why is this?  (Read 4582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Why is this?
« on: March 18, 2011, 05:46:18 pm »
x^n

if last digit of x = 9 and n is even:

the last digit of n is 1.


Example

9^4 = 6561
69^2 = 4761

Any number

Can any of you explain me why?

Ashbad

  • Guest
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2011, 05:50:09 pm »
9^2 = 81
9^4 = 6561
9^6 = 531441
9^8 = 43046721
9^10 = 3486784401

And...

19^2 = 361
29^2 = 841
39^2 = 1521
49^2 = 2401
59^2 = 3281

... if it helps prove scout's legit point.

Offline merthsoft

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 241
  • Rating: +63/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2011, 05:50:33 pm »
Because 9*9 = 81, and when you keep multiplying by 9, the last number will bounce between 9 and 1. So when the power is odd, it will be 9, when it's even it'll be 1.
Shaun

Offline leafy

  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1554
  • Rating: +475/-97
  • Seizon senryakuuuu!
    • View Profile
    • keff.me
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2011, 05:54:21 pm »
9^(2n) mod 10 = 1
and 9^(2n-1) mod 10 = 9.

It's the same thing with 2 - 2, 4, 8, 6, 2, 4, 8, 6, etc.
In-progress: Graviter (...)

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2011, 09:46:05 pm »
Very nice and simple proof.  How about a slightly harder one.  Why can you check divisibility by 3 or 9 by adding up all the digits of a number?

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2011, 08:07:04 am »
Very nice and simple proof.  How about a slightly harder one.  Why can you check divisibility by 3 or 9 by adding up all the digits of a number?

That's harder.

9^(2n) mod 10 = 1
and 9^(2n-1) mod 10 = 9.

It's the same thing with 2 - 2, 4, 8, 6, 2, 4, 8, 6, etc.

Because 9*9 = 81, and when you keep multiplying by 9, the last number will bounce between 9 and 1. So when the power is odd, it will be 9, when it's even it'll be 1.

Thanks!

Offline calcdude84se

  • Needs Motivation
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2272
  • Rating: +78/-13
  • Wondering where their free time went...
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2011, 04:54:09 pm »
I'll take it :)
So, a base-10 number can be represented as an*10n+an-1*10n-1+...+a1*10+a0
You can find divisibility by nine by finding the remainder when the number is divided by nine, in other words, by taking the number mod 9.
So, 10 = 1 (mod 9), and also 10n = 1 (mod 9)
This means that an*10n+an-1*10n-1+...+a1*10+a0 = an+an-1+...+a1+a0 (mod 9)
So, the remainder of a number divided by 9 is equal to the remainder of the sum of its digits written in base 10 by 9.
More generally, this is the divisibility test for n-1 in base n. :D
"People think computers will keep them from making mistakes. They're wrong. With computers you make mistakes faster."
-Adam Osborne
Spoiler For "PartesOS links":
I'll put it online when it does something.

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2011, 05:40:20 pm »
That only addresses (A mod 9 = 0) iff (0 = <digital sum> mod 9). He also asked about (A mod 9 = 0) iff (0 = <digital sum> mod 3).

Since it's been demonstrated that the test holds for 9 and 3 is a prime factor of 9, the test holds for some subset of the set of all multiples of 3. However, it also appears to hold for all multiples of 3, which that test alone cannot account for. Well, actually it can. The proof is essentially that used for 9. But I had fun testing all integers up to 12,000 with my BASIC program  :P
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline willrandship

  • Omnimagus of the Multi-Base.
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2953
  • Rating: +98/-13
  • Insert sugar to begin programming subroutine.
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2011, 05:41:48 pm »
BTW, the first post can be a little misread. You should define it with another letter. n cannot be even and start with one. :P

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2011, 05:54:15 pm »
Okay, finished testing all multiples of 3 through 12,000 against the digital sum test. It works without exceptions :D

Sometimes knowing the answer just isn't as satisfying as brute forcing it.
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline jnesselr

  • King Graphmastur
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2270
  • Rating: +81/-20
  • TAO == epic
    • View Profile
Re: Why is this?
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2011, 01:42:12 pm »
lol, yeah.  good job qwerty.55.