Omnimaga

Omnimaga => Our Projects => Ndless => Topic started by: DJ Omnimaga on November 03, 2010, 04:53:12 am

Title: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on November 03, 2010, 04:53:12 am
First of all, the great news is that Omnimaga comes 3rd in Google search results for Ndless. However, check the screenshot below. Fail from Google? Or maybe ExtendeD used to work for TI then knew that the Nspire would be locked down, so he developed Ndless 6 years in advance ;D
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: SirCmpwn on November 03, 2010, 08:47:01 am
(http://ui24.gamespot.com/1751/lolwutpear_2.jpg)
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Broseph Radson on November 03, 2010, 08:50:30 am
(http://img.kyon.pl/static/img/remiq.net_923.jpg)
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on November 03, 2010, 12:04:13 pm
Indeed. That was weird when I saw that at first. It reminds me when AaroneusTheGreat received e-mails from future dates under Gmail . :P
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: qazz42 on November 03, 2010, 03:09:20 pm
google, you hasth disappointed me
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: yunhua98 on November 03, 2010, 03:30:34 pm
lol.  you should send them an email about that.  ;)  speaking of which, what is their corporate email?
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: TIfanx1999 on November 03, 2010, 03:47:24 pm
Wow, we're inactive if our last post was in 2004... :P
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on November 03, 2010, 11:43:10 pm
Yeah, I wonder why it picked 2004. Maybe it got confused with one of the early version of the site :P
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Jonius7 on November 04, 2010, 06:09:25 am
Man i actually searched for ndless and got that page, but didn't even notice the dates!!! Nice find DJ!
i dunno, ask the google crawlers to 'readd' ur website???
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on November 04, 2010, 09:47:58 am
Not too sure, I think that's more of a bug report thing to do. :P
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: calcforth on November 11, 2010, 02:40:26 pm
Yeah, I wonder why it picked 2004. Maybe it got confused with one of the early version of the site :P
Well, it found lots of different dates on page and needed to determine which one is the correct one. One date in particular was mentioned lots of times: Aug 12th 2004. Five times here (http://ourl.ca/4178), four times here (http://ourl.ca/7106). And it precedes other dates. Obviously it's the date of document creation! Check the pages yourself: the "Aug 12th 2004" is still there - and in many copies, too!
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Munchor on November 11, 2010, 02:43:51 pm
Not too sure, I think that's more of a bug report thing to do. :P

Would they ever hear to us if we reported a bug by contacting them?

Hahahahaha, fail 2004
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Deep Toaster on November 11, 2010, 02:47:32 pm
Google's actually pretty famous for actually listening to suggestions/reports...

Should we?
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on November 11, 2010, 04:50:59 pm
Yeah, I wonder why it picked 2004. Maybe it got confused with one of the early version of the site :P
Well, it found lots of different dates on page and needed to determine which one is the correct one. One date in particular was mentioned lots of times: Aug 12th 2004. Five times here (http://ourl.ca/4178), four times here (http://ourl.ca/7106). And it precedes other dates. Obviously it's the date of document creation! Check the pages yourself: the "Aug 12th 2004" is still there - and in many copies, too!
Ooh I see now: I thought Google just had compatibility with most forum softwares and grabbed the date from the topic header. I was wrong, then. I guess maybe I should put spaces in the date of that huge quote in my signature. :P

Welcome here by the way. I deleted your duplicate account called forthcalc, though, because they aren't allowed and it had a spam e-mail address (ending in .ru)
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Munchor on January 12, 2011, 04:06:00 pm
(http://andy.mm2c.com/vortex/lolwut_china.jpg)
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Deep Toaster on January 12, 2011, 06:15:26 pm
lolVAT? Epic necro?

Anywayy, it seems to be sorta fixed:
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on January 17, 2011, 02:29:37 pm
That was one necessary necropost. :P</sarcasm>
Title: Re: Fail.
Post by: Deep Toaster on January 17, 2011, 02:35:08 pm
Whoops, the image didn't show up... Fixed.