Author Topic: ndless 3.2  (Read 20092 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Legimet

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 336
  • Rating: +29/-0
    • View Profile
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2014, 10:32:36 pm »
No. Flash is a closed, proprietary format, and the best free software player is Gnash. Probably would consume a lot of resources on a low-spec device like this.

Offline nspireguy

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 158
  • Rating: +11/-6
    • View Profile
    • NspireGuy
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2014, 06:45:58 am »
oh well. but we could still do alot lot of cool stuff, right?
...and thanks 4 the info!!!
« Last Edit: February 13, 2014, 06:33:00 am by nspireguy »

Offline nspireguy

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 158
  • Rating: +11/-6
    • View Profile
    • NspireGuy
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #32 on: March 16, 2014, 07:00:41 pm »
YES!!! ITS OUT!! Now everyone can use ndless3.6!!! The only thing i dont like is that its not reboot proof.

Offline Hayleia

  • Programming Absol
  • Coder Of Tomorrow
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3367
  • Rating: +393/-7
    • View Profile
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #33 on: March 16, 2014, 07:01:35 pm »
It is reboot proof if you have an old enough hardware revision and if you use nlaunchy 2.4.
I own: 83+ ; 84+SE ; 76.fr ; CX CAS ; Prizm ; 84+CSE
Sorry if I answer with something that seems unrelated, English is not my primary language and I might not have understood well. Sorry if I make English mistakes too.

click here to know where you got your last +1s

Offline nspireguy

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 158
  • Rating: +11/-6
    • View Profile
    • NspireGuy
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #34 on: March 16, 2014, 07:08:32 pm »
oh. is that because it will automaticly installs it if you have the ndless_resourses on calc?

Offline Legimet

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 336
  • Rating: +29/-0
    • View Profile
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2014, 07:49:19 am »
Yes, that's right. You don't need the ndless_installer.

Offline nspireguy

  • LV4 Regular (Next: 200)
  • ****
  • Posts: 158
  • Rating: +11/-6
    • View Profile
    • NspireGuy
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2014, 07:52:12 am »
does ndless 3.6 work on OS3.1?

Offline Aspiring

  • LV3 Member (Next: 100)
  • ***
  • Posts: 81
  • Rating: +5/-0
  • The only source of knowledge is experience-Einsten
    • View Profile
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #37 on: March 19, 2014, 07:11:07 pm »
I doubt it.  There are different "loop-holes" that are used for both os's.

Offline Legimet

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 336
  • Rating: +29/-0
    • View Profile
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #38 on: March 19, 2014, 09:29:07 pm »
Nope. Many things (including syscall addresses) are OS version-specific.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Former TI programmer
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55896
  • Rating: +3152/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • DJ Omnimaga Music
Re: ndless 3.2
« Reply #39 on: March 19, 2014, 09:31:34 pm »
Indeed. One clue that can indicate that is the fact 3.6 isn't reboot-proof (kinda like OS 1.1). I think only 1 Ndless version worked on multiple OSes and it was Ndless 2.0. It ran on OS 1.7, 2.0.1 and 2.1, but not on 2.0. I think 2.0 support was intentionally left out as a way to discourage using OS 2.0 because that OS was dangerous and could permanently damage click/touchpad calcs in ways similar to OS 3.0.1, but not as bad.