Calculator Community > Oasis

Requests

(1/5) > >>

Eeems:
Ok, request anything you would like to see in Oasis here :)

DJ Omnimaga:
I assume you still have plans to support every possible TI-83+ z80 ASM syntaxes, right?

Galandros:

--- Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on July 17, 2010, 02:05:06 pm ---I assume you still have plans to support every possible TI-83+ z80 ASM syntaxes, right?

--- End quote ---
There is only one syntax for z80 ASM. 68k assembly has more than one, though.
Going in depth Zilog originally used all mnemonics in capital letters but recently I don't see any code on capital letters.

EDIT: but different assemblers might use different syntaxes.
assembler directives can start eitheir with a . or #, for example:
.include "file.inc"
#include file.inc

DJ Omnimaga:

--- Quote from: Galandros on July 24, 2010, 05:24:15 am ---
--- Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on July 17, 2010, 02:05:06 pm ---I assume you still have plans to support every possible TI-83+ z80 ASM syntaxes, right?

--- End quote ---
There is only one syntax for z80 ASM. 68k assembly has more than one, though.
Going in depth Zilog originally used all mnemonics in capital letters but recently I don't see any code on capital letters.

EDIT: but different assemblers might use different syntaxes.
assembler directives can start eitheir with a . or #, for example:
.include "file.inc"
#include file.inc

--- End quote ---
Yeah I was talking about the different syntaxes used by assemblers. I recall the way Bcalls are called being slightly different from TASM to other assemblers, for example. Some people had compiling errors due to that before, because they used a different ASM compiler than what's mentionned in ASM In 28 Days (TASM)

Eeems:

Muaha :P
Ok, yes I'm going to attempt to support all of the assembler syntax's so you can use code specific to any assembler and it will compile correctly, no more trying to convert code :)
Anybody have anything else they want supported?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page