ec1Lbl 0 Output(1,1,"CANDLE FLAME Output(1,1,"C N L
QuoteBegin-necro+14 Oct, 2007, 23:34-->QUOTE (necro @ 14 Oct, 2007, 23:34) | If 1=1 Then goto 0 End |
I can't believe this made me laugh so hard...
QuoteBegin-Radical Pi+14 Oct, 2007, 16:57-->QUOTE (Radical Pi @ 14 Oct, 2007, 16:57) | QuoteBegin-necro+14 Oct, 2007, 23:34-->QUOTE (necro @ 14 Oct, 2007, 23:34) | If 1=1 Then goto 0 End |
I can't believe this made me laugh so hard...
|
Necro, I can't believe I am saying this, but here is an optimized version: c1 -->CODE | ec1Lbl 0 Output(1,1,"CANDLE FLAME Output(1,1,"C N L
O_O
QuoteBegin-Delnar_Ersike+15 Oct, 2007, 0:32-->QUOTE (Delnar_Ersike @ 15 Oct, 2007, 0:32) | QuoteBegin-Radical Pi+14 Oct, 2007, 16:57-->QUOTE (Radical Pi @ 14 Oct, 2007, 16:57) | QuoteBegin-necro+14 Oct, 2007, 23:34-->QUOTE (necro @ 14 Oct, 2007, 23:34) | If 1=1 Then goto 0 End |
I can't believe this made me laugh so hard...
|
Necro, I can't believe I am saying this, but here is an optimized version: c1 -->CODE | ec1Lbl 0 Output(1,1,"CANDLE FLAME Output(1,1,"C N L
Well, I guess I just had to take some of your updates so here is my entry c1-->CODE | ec1 "THIS IS A COMMENT! Lbl 0 Output(1,1,"CANDLE FLAME" Output(2,2," " Output(1,1,"C N L
Why even use a label? Code:
QUOTE | While 1 Output(1,1,"C N L
what does Ansnot( do? I can't find this command in the catalog or is it a TI-84 command not avaliable on the 83+?
Ans not( Ans
oh lol i was sure they were one command x.x
my bad
why use a label? So the program will eventualy glitch.
the more I am looking at this I think necro program is meant to be a joke. In fact it came from nowhere, there wasn't even a new contest running and the topic wasn't even about programming contest it was about pixel art :P
LOL, its 2 seprate comands; first is Ans, then there is a bolean operator "not". Using "not" with Ans inverts the answer and it causes a slight pause in the program. so the command line is "Ans""not(Ans. does that make sense? *Edit* i just did it for the hell of it anyway, though strangley enough it did give me an interesting idea.
make more sense now :-P
I'm pretty sure all the recent posts in this topic were joke posts DJ Omnimaga :P
Oh, and 42*(Ans*not(Ans)) is much more optimized.
nope x.x
|
|
|
|
|
|