Omnimaga

Calculator Community => Other Calculators => Topic started by: Spyro543 on March 12, 2012, 04:40:48 pm

Title: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Spyro543 on March 12, 2012, 04:40:48 pm
I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Spenceboy98 on March 12, 2012, 04:42:26 pm
When I was deciding, people prompted me to get a Prizm. So I did.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: ruler501 on March 12, 2012, 04:43:58 pm
I would say prizm because casio isnt trying to screw over its dev community like ti is
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Lionel Debroux on March 12, 2012, 04:50:50 pm
The Nspire has more raw power, but is a closed platform, and TI is trying every trick to close users' right to run whatever software they want on the platforms they own; the Prizm is more open, but has lower raw power.

Also noteworthy is the fact that the Nspire has a CAS version, while the Prizm doesn't (at the time of this writing, and AFAICT): if you're not taking any silly exams which forbid usage of the CAS, it might tip your balance :)
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Dingus on March 12, 2012, 05:06:55 pm
I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
That's a no brainier.  Get the Prizm.  Two thing are clear. First, beyond a doubt TI will continue to make life difficult for developers so the programmers will continue to migrate to Casio.  Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Adriweb on March 12, 2012, 05:25:57 pm
I've been thinking about getting a new calculator; either a CX or a Prizm. I know each has their advantages and disadvantages. Which one should I get (and why)? Also, money is not a problem. I have enough money to get either one.
That's a no brainier.  Get the Prizm.  Two thing are clear. First, beyond a doubt TI will continue to make life difficult for developers so the programmers will continue to migrate to Casio.  Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.

While the beginning can be true objectively the end of your sentence isn't right at all for me.

Casio isn't teacher oriented and doesn't make a good job at getting popular among teachers & schools, and for math etc. the TI devices will always be better.
And don't forget that's what calculators are for in the first place. If TI is restricting native programming capabilities in the Nspire, which is sad for the community, it's also very good for the teachers, for example, so it has a bad effect on some people (the community who wants to have native programming) (which isn't very important for TI for an educational point of view), and a good one for the 99,99% rest of their customers : teachers & schools.


Also, CASIO-fans say programming is better on the CX, but Ndless has proven otherwise, guys.
Jailbreaking needed or not, the final result is there :)
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: cyanophycean314 on March 12, 2012, 07:58:06 pm
Secondly, the TI customer service people (1-800-TI-CARES) really don't care and mostly aren't qualified to offer any assistance any way!  Casio represents the future.  TI represents the past.

Do you really need TI-CARES? You have Omni!

Personally, I slant to the CX. More power, GBC emulator, nDoom, more storage space. ndless allows native code and there is Lua natively available (with new improvements in 3.2).

TI attacking programmability? Who updates their OS anyway? As long as they don't keep on enticing people with their new features :P The physics engine is looking quite impressive, and x= graphing may draw teachers to update...
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: BalancedFury on March 12, 2012, 08:03:14 pm
^^^ exactly
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Lionel Debroux on March 13, 2012, 02:04:28 am
Quote
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
That's silly, Adriweb. Lua can in no way be qualified "native", and its performance is easily more than 10 times slower than native code (it's a purely interpreted language).

Quote
Who updates their OS anyway?
Users buying brand-new calculators. They quickly become a majority soon after brand-new calculators hit the shelves...
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Adriweb on March 13, 2012, 02:34:51 am
Quote
And in "native" development, Lua is doing a pretty good job. Especially with OS 3.2
That's silly, Adriweb. Lua can in no way be qualified "native", and its performance is easily more than 10 times slower than native code (it's a purely interpreted language).

Oops yeah, I meant native as in "without any modification like Jailbraking", but you know what I meant.
And yea, obviously, it's slower than C/ASM, that goes without saying.
But it's still inifinitely faster than Basic...
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Jim Bauwens on March 13, 2012, 03:51:56 am
I personally (although I never tried a Prizm) prefer a CX.
One of the main reason it because hardware wise it beats the nspire -- but of course you will only be able to take advantage of it with ndless.
But I don't mind to wait for new version of Ndless, and I know that ExtendeD is dedicated to it. There has been an Ndless version for every OS IIRC.
And Lua is growing bigger and better, both by input of the community and TI.

As others have said, the CX (with/without CAS) just beats the Prizm in calculator terms.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Stefan Bauwens on March 13, 2012, 04:32:11 am
Maybe my article could help you?
http://ourl.ca/15482/290408
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Dingus on March 13, 2012, 06:33:28 pm

 Super article Stefan!

Having read all the posts in a very unbiased manner, I think what it boils down to is that if the new TI os cannot be hacked and a new version of Ndless be created for it, anyone that has supported ti by buying their products has no grounds for complaint.  You got what you deserve.   
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Reo on March 13, 2012, 06:48:10 pm
I think what it boils down to is that if the new TI os cannot be hacked and a new version of Ndless be created for it, anyone that has supported ti by buying their products has no grounds for complaint.  You got what you deserve.
Nobody can make such claims yet because the firmware isn't out. It's extremely possible that there's still an exploit waiting to be discovered. Beyond that, the "you got what you deserve" comment is extremely harsh. Nobody "deserved" this; there was a risk taken, but don't rub our losses in our faces just because you support Casio.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Dingus on March 13, 2012, 10:51:27 pm

Nobody can make such claims yet because the firmware isn't out. It's extremely possible that there's still an exploit waiting to be discovered. Beyond that, the "you got what you deserve" comment is extremely harsh. Nobody "deserved" this; there was a risk taken, but don't rub our losses in our faces just because you support Casio.
[/quote]
I'm sorry Reo, I really wasn't trying to rub your losses in your faces, but the time is over due for everyone to understand that you can't have it both ways. If you really object to the way TI treats this community then show it by not supporting TI and their products.  On the other hand, how does anyone have any right to complain about the way TI treats us if they are going to support ti and their products?  I read all this moaning and groaning about how TI is doing this terrible thing with their next os update and then there is all this support for their products.  Thats rediculous.  If you don't like what TI is doing, then stop supporting them or, if you choose to support them, stop complaining.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Dingus on March 13, 2012, 10:51:29 pm

Nobody can make such claims yet because the firmware isn't out. It's extremely possible that there's still an exploit waiting to be discovered. Beyond that, the "you got what you deserve" comment is extremely harsh. Nobody "deserved" this; there was a risk taken, but don't rub our losses in our faces just because you support Casio.
[/quote]
I'm sorry Reo, I really wasn't trying to rub your losses in your faces, but the time is over due for everyone to understand that you can't have it both ways. If you really object to the way TI treats this community then show it by not supporting TI and their products.  On the other hand, how does anyone have any right to complain about the way TI treats us if they are going to support ti and their products?  I read all this moaning and groaning about how TI is doing this terrible thing with their next os update and then there is all this support for their products.  Thats rediculous.  If you don't like what TI is doing, then stop supporting them or, if you choose to support them, stop complaining.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Jonius7 on March 13, 2012, 10:55:01 pm
Hey I think you double posted, Dingus :)
Anyway, you'll have to make a choice Spiro. Casio can be better because they aren't intentionally blocking third party development, but the CX and TI-nspire family in general has a larger resolution screen, and drawing commands when you program in Lua are much faster.
I've used calcs from both TI and Casio, and depends on which one suits.

Or better just get both (though that may cost too much)
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Dingus on March 14, 2012, 05:12:34 pm
Yeah, I guess I somehow double posted.  Maybe it's the keyboard or something.  It seems to happen several times a year and I don't know why.  Sorry about that. 
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Jim Bauwens on March 14, 2012, 05:17:19 pm
It might not be your fault, but your internet ;)
Maybe Netham should add protection for this.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: aeTIos on March 15, 2012, 06:04:34 am
I would go for an NSpire.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Scipi on March 17, 2012, 11:26:22 pm
I would say, as of right now, Nspire due to there being more development for it and more programs already released. However, since Casio did their promotion, I think that development for the Prizm is going to skyrocket and there could possibly be more developed for it in the future.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: DJ Omnimaga on March 24, 2012, 10:07:07 pm
In reply to Dingus, we need to remain polite to other members, though, and in most classes people are actually forced to buy TI calcs, even Nspires sometimes. I find your last post quite uncalled for Dingus and you better be careful (after all, people have every right to complain about what they bought. Maybe they simply do not like what other calcs has to offer too, such as the Prizm's considerably inferior RAM for example).

Also, people buy TI calcs because they want to program for a platform on which their games will have a greater audience (which, sadly, is TI calcs, and we can do nothing about it because of their monopoly in schools). The PRIZM popularity is picking up a bit, but some people would rather make a Nspire Lua game that will be played by hundreds of people in the world rather than a PRIZM C or ASM game that will be played by only 13 or 14 people.

I wouldn't be surprised if some schools actually even disallowed any other calc in their classes too. Also news flash for you: Some areas only sells TI calcs and not everyone got access to a credit card or Paypal account to buy online.

Also I'm sure the exploit was fixed,  but given TI's history of OS bugs, I wouldn't be surprised if the new OS, especially with the many upcoming changes and updates in it, even had more exploits than any other. It's just a matter of finding the exploit then making sure Ndless installs correctly without risks of damages.

If you don't remain polite, what you might actually do is simply discourage people from signing up on the forums. They will find your posts and act like "Wow! Look how bad they are treating their users at Omnimaga! I'm gonna go to another site instead.", which happened before elsewhere and to a lesser extent here.
Title: Re: CX or Prizm?
Post by: Jonius7 on March 26, 2012, 08:44:30 am
If you don't remain polite, what you might actually do is simply discourage people from signing up on the forums. They will find your posts and act like "Wow! Look how bad they are treating their users at Omnimaga! I'm gonna go to another site instead.", which happened before elsewhere and to a lesser extent here.
O.O I hope not! I hope Omnimaga doesn't have an image like that outside the community :|