Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CVSoft

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
ASM / Re: TI-85 Programming: Getting Started
« on: April 05, 2014, 02:38:34 am »
TI-85 BASIC is identical to TI-86 BASIC, but (almost) twice faster. It also has similarities with 84+ BASIC.
I don't think it's twice faster (more like 33% or so) but yeah, 82 BASIC is its closest relative given the order-of-operations change that the TI-83 introduced.

Relative to TI-86 BASIC, TI-85 BASIC lacks a few nonessential commands like DelVar and LCust(, and menus are limited to 5 items instead of 15. Get( and Send( are Input "CBLGET", and Output("CBLSEND", respectively, but they only work on TI-85s marked with "CBL" next to the serial number (and thus ROM 9.0 or 10.0). Everything runs noticeably faster.

Relative to TI-83 BASIC, there's some key differences. First and foremost, tokenization. Command names aren't tokenized until first execution, so the commands can be typed out on the keypad. In addition, lowercase is allowed in variable names too (which can be anything 8 characters and isn't taken by the system). The screen is 21 characters wide, and pixels are non-square. As I mentioned slightly earlier, the names of any variable aren't limited to fixed options, and everything uses the same 8-character variable name space. There's a few new variable types like constants, but these don't matter to programmers as everything we're used to having is present. The capitalization of system variables is a bit different. All OS-defined function names are limited to 8 characters too. y-equations can't be evaluated like y1(A), you have to use EvalF(y1,x,A), annoyingly. The OS treats that as implied multiplication, and the TI-86 resolved this. Most single-argument functions use a space after the name rather than an opening parenthesis (such as int x vs. int(x)), like the TI-81 and TI-82. Other than these, most code can be pretty easily ported over.

17
Miscellaneous / Re: Post Your Cave
« on: October 02, 2013, 02:12:18 am »
CVSoft, I personally wouldn't call these gaming PCs but meh. :P

Depends what games they play. For much, much older games even the Pentium MMX machine is sufficient. I'll build a really nice Core i7 machine once I get a job. But when Windows 98 is a typical system requirement, it isn't worth spending the money on one yet. I'm not too much of a gamer.

18
Miscellaneous / Re: Post Your Cave
« on: September 28, 2013, 09:51:10 pm »

19
Miscellaneous / Re: Post Your Cave
« on: September 23, 2013, 02:37:29 am »
Click the images for the excessively-compressed full-size images.


and with labels:


Finally got around to using my 8-port KVM switch, so I just had to plug in all of my computers.  :hyper:

20
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: August 07, 2013, 05:05:22 am »
Well, a calc that has AAA batteries installed isn't drawing very much current from the battery, hence hence the long battery lives. Someone with the proper tools should test this quantitatively.

21
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: August 04, 2013, 07:37:57 am »
At least on the 85 it ws used for a year and kept in a drawer for a little over a decade before I got it. I doubt it was ever changed.

22
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: August 04, 2013, 06:32:47 am »
All of my calcs are still on the original backup batteries, the oldest being my 1994 TI-85 (which is 19 years this month :D )

Datamath has a lot of goodies that aren't well linked, for some reason.

23
Miscellaneous / Re: Post Your Cave
« on: August 02, 2013, 07:39:56 pm »
There may be two monitors there (three in the picture) but the computers using each monitor aren't very powerful. Only one isn't using onboard graphics ("Mars"). I need to upgrade its RAM...

24
Miscellaneous / Re: Post Your Cave
« on: August 02, 2013, 04:34:35 pm »

And with labels:
Spoiler For Spoiler:
Images are clickable for almost-full-size

25
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: July 31, 2013, 04:40:17 pm »
Perhaps they had problems with making the backup battery terminals fit inside the calculator, or that the backup battery was causing problems with the RAM. Either way, they intended to have one but it didn't happen.

26
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: July 28, 2013, 09:59:58 pm »
TI did switch the hardware around a lot on the 81. I have a later TI-81 (2.0V, hardware revision F) and it doesn't have the memory-mapped screen. I've taken pictures of partial characters on the screen, mid-refresh.

27
Miscellaneous / Re: "What If" Discussion
« on: July 28, 2013, 07:17:48 pm »
What if i had 8961 more posts?
I still wouldn't be the top poster.

What if this wasn't my 40th post?
I wouldn't be l33t!

What if I didn't play Minecraft?
I'd probably have written more code and have less friends.

What if I wrote TI-83 code instead of TI-82 code?
I'd have a positive download count!

28
Miscellaneous / Re: Post your desktop
« on: July 28, 2013, 06:58:01 pm »
I have a fairly disappointing desktop.

29
Other Calculators / Re: TI-81 Screen Types?
« on: July 28, 2013, 06:37:58 pm »
(hopefully acceptable necrodoublepost) After browsing through several hundred eBay listings, they were all manufactured between mid 1992 and early 1993, with hardware B. It also includes ViewScreen models, but I am unsure about the attached screen. I also noticed that the first-generation TI-81s without backup batteries are quite common.

30
Computer Projects and Ideas / Re: EFnet bot policies
« on: July 26, 2013, 11:27:56 pm »
Even though I'm not a bot, prison.net shot me down for no good reason. They don't like anything automatic there.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5