Author Topic: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+  (Read 12125 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline holmes221b

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 282
  • Rating: +13/-1
  • RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
    • View Profile
    • My Livejournal
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #90 on: January 11, 2011, 12:25:56 pm »
Yeah, I tend to (over)use a lot of conditionals in my programs...

As for the greyscale, I eagerly await to see what you come up with.

Spoiler For "Projects":
Spoiler For "Because Everyone Else Is":
*Sigh*
can we keep this on topic? The topic is about what the big thing might be, NOT SEX

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Former TI programmer
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55918
  • Rating: +3152/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • DJ Omnimaga Music
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #91 on: January 11, 2011, 07:07:42 pm »
Grayscale? Wut? O.O

That said... http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/385/38543.html

Quite ironically, the only Omnimaga news that ever featured a math program was about that quadratic solver (although it was a fake news)
« Last Edit: January 11, 2011, 07:08:45 pm by DJ Omnimaga »

Offline holmes221b

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 282
  • Rating: +13/-1
  • RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
    • View Profile
    • My Livejournal
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #92 on: December 17, 2011, 12:18:06 am »
I am thinking of re-vamping this two programs in the near future....perhaps I can make them more efficient using matrices....

Spoiler For "Projects":
Spoiler For "Because Everyone Else Is":
*Sigh*
can we keep this on topic? The topic is about what the big thing might be, NOT SEX

Offline Deep Toaster

  • So much to do, so much time, so little motivation
  • Administrator
  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 8217
  • Rating: +758/-15
    • View Profile
    • ClrHome
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #93 on: December 18, 2011, 01:29:58 pm »
Might be a bit late in saying this, but hey, welcome back.

Better using matrices sounds good. TI lets you use so many math operations on matrices, so you might as well use them :)




Offline holmes221b

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 282
  • Rating: +13/-1
  • RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
    • View Profile
    • My Livejournal
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #94 on: December 22, 2011, 04:56:50 pm »
I've also gotten a better grip on using matrices in programs since I wrote these two programs.

Spoiler For "Projects":
Spoiler For "Because Everyone Else Is":
*Sigh*
can we keep this on topic? The topic is about what the big thing might be, NOT SEX

Offline squidgetx

  • Food.
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1881
  • Rating: +503/-17
  • rawr.
    • View Profile
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #95 on: December 22, 2011, 07:19:33 pm »
Oh my god, it's holmes221b!!!!

Hey, sounds like a good idea. Go for it

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Former TI programmer
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55918
  • Rating: +3152/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • DJ Omnimaga Music
Re: Multitab 83+ & Chemitab 83+
« Reply #96 on: December 27, 2011, 02:04:08 am »
Good idea with the matrices. Just keep in mind that if before you didn't use lists, matrices can be extremely huge. :P (a 50x55 matrix takes the entire RAM if I remember) I doubt you need extremely large matrices, though. Just make sure the user knows he needs lots of RAM. When storing an entire matrice, it copies all of it in Ans, so you need double the amount of RAM to store it.