Author Topic: Wrath of god/zeus (Read 7287 times)

Liazon · « **Reply #30 on:** November 09, 2007, 02:54:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-lordofthegeeks+9 Nov, 2007, 15:14-->

QUOTE (lordofthegeeks @ 9 Nov, 2007, 15:14)

@liazon You ever played animal crossing?
the animals are humanized almost compleatly.
http://img130.imageshack.us/my.php?image=animalscreen003um8.jpg
heres a screen shot of the gamecube one. with the charictor octavian.

Edit: spelling

clearly I don't know a thing about animal crossing ^^ thanks

lordofthegeeks · « **Reply #31 on:** November 10, 2007, 08:41:00 am »

Its ok. But you should see if you can find a copy to play.
Its really a great game.
back on topic
Nice sprites

Xphoenix · « **Reply #32 on:** November 11, 2007, 07:57:00 am »

QuoteBegin-DJ Omnimaga+9 Nov, 2007, 19:21-->

QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 9 Nov, 2007, 19:21)

I think he edited his post to actually add the spelling mistakes because there was none before the edit %)

You're saying he puts spelling errors on purpose? :police:

lordofthegeeks · « **Reply #33 on:** November 11, 2007, 11:02:00 am »

no I put them in there by accident. :oops:

but i didn't read the edit as carefully as I did the original

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #34 on:** November 11, 2007, 12:13:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-Xphoenix+11 Nov, 2007, 13:57-->

QUOTE (Xphoenix @ 11 Nov, 2007, 13:57)

QuoteBegin-DJ Omnimaga+9 Nov, 2007, 19:21-->

QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 9 Nov, 2007, 19:21)

I think he edited his post to actually add the spelling mistakes because there was none before the edit %)

You're saying he puts spelling errors on purpose? :police:

yep he did. And ignore his post above this one, he really did! %)

j/k

I am not one to judge cuz i do a lot

altough I never spell character as charictor

JonimusPrime · « **Reply #35 on:** November 11, 2007, 12:16:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-art_of_camelot+8 Nov, 2007, 21:0-->

QUOTE (art_of_camelot @ 8 Nov, 2007, 21:00)

Here are the man and the tree, the tree came out ok inverted but it seems the man looked better normally .(even though normally he is kinda ugly too

) Ah well. What do you think? Is the tree size ok? should be 30 x 44 and roughly 1/4 of the screen. the man came out to be 6 x 16 and 8 x 16 respectivley.
user posted image

Nice work

. Yeah the man could use some work and could maybe be a little smaller and I still need a cloud about the same size as the dog.

Netham45 · « **Reply #36 on:** November 11, 2007, 01:06:00 pm »

hmm, just a sugestion, try making the mans head completely white.

lordofthegeeks · « **Reply #37 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:22:00 pm »

QuoteBegin-DJ Omnimaga+11 Nov, 2007, 19:13-->

QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 11 Nov, 2007, 19:13)

QuoteBegin-Xphoenix+11 Nov, 2007, 13:57-->

QUOTE (Xphoenix @ 11 Nov, 2007, 13:57)

QuoteBegin-DJ Omnimaga+9 Nov, 2007, 19:21-->

QUOTE (DJ Omnimaga @ 9 Nov, 2007, 19:21)

I think he edited his post to actually add the spelling mistakes because there was none before the edit %)

You're saying he puts spelling errors on purpose? :police:

yep he did. And ignore his post above this one, he really did! %)

j/k

I am not one to judge cuz i do a lot

altough I never spell character as charictor

ive always spelled charator as charictor.

sprite ways

new man

10001
00000
10101
10010
10001
11011
10101
10100
10101
11011
11001

TIfanx1999 · « **Reply #38 on:** November 12, 2007, 06:38:00 am »

QUOTE

Nice work . Yeah the man could use some work and could maybe be a little smaller and I still need a cloud about the same size as the dog.

K, I'll see what i can do. By smaller do you mean you want him shorter, thinner, or both?
QuoteBegin

-->

QUOTE

hmm, just a sugestion, try making the mans head completely white.

Yea, I see that too will do ^_^.

JonimusPrime · « **Reply #39 on:** November 12, 2007, 01:40:00 pm »

Nvm about the dog he is fine as is. I really should start coding this BUt I have no clue where to start and am so busy with School work and learning LISP (a programing language).

lordofthegeeks · « **Reply #40 on:** November 12, 2007, 03:20:00 pm »

uh lisp is old. as it is in a 1984 science year book article on computer launguges alon with logo, basic, fortran & cobol .
and I thought Quick basic was old

JonimusPrime · « **Reply #41 on:** November 12, 2007, 03:44:00 pm »

Fortran is the only older one but Lisp still rocks and only Ruby is close to it in Power so I will stick with LISP. It may be from 1958 but if it has survived this long it must be good. You can do so much with Lisp so easily why would I go with anything else.

Author Topic: Wrath of god/zeus (Read 7287 times)

Liazon

Xphoenix