### Author Topic: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?  (Read 8924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### pimathbrainiac

• Occasionally I make projects
• Members
• LV10 31337 u53r (Next: 2000)
• Posts: 1731
• Rating: +136/-23
• dagaem
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2013, 09:21:00 pm »
The TI 89 has better everything except for user-base. That said, if you aim for POTY, TI 89 is a much easier category
I am Bach.

#### Sorunome

• Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox!
• Support Staff
• LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
• Posts: 7920
• Rating: +374/-13
• Derpy Hooves
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2013, 09:39:29 pm »
I would presonally do for the 89 as you have 1st a bigger display and 2nd a better prozessor and 3rd more people than you think have 'em
 THE GAMEAlso, check out my websiteIf OmnomIRC is screwed up, blame me!Click here to give me an internet!

#### Streetwalrus

• LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
• Posts: 3821
• Rating: +80/-8
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2013, 02:14:24 am »
I'm planning to get an 89 personally. I know there's already a lot of games for it, but new ones would be cool.

BTW how did the 68k community die ? Lionel Debroux mentioned something about TIGCC maintenance that slowly stopped, and the lack of ASM coders because of C (which is an error IMHO, we z80 users did not abandon ASM because of Axe).

#### TIfanx1999

• ಠ_ಠ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
• CoT Emeritus
• LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
• Posts: 6173
• Rating: +191/-9
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2013, 02:46:52 am »
I think there were several reasons. Many engineers use these type of calcs, and from what i hear the hp is usually preferred. For most school courses the 83+/84+ is recommended. Ti hasn't actively promoted this calc in years either.

#### DJ Omnimaga

• Former TI programmer
• CoT Emeritus
• LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
• Posts: 55910
• Rating: +3152/-232
• CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2013, 03:10:30 am »
Also somebody in the French community ran the entire 68K community into the ground. All veteran developers left due to the drama and things never recovered since TI doesn't market that calc anymore. As for TIGCC it stopped being maintained, but GCC4TI is still alive.

Also the TI-89 is so overpriced compared to other calcs. Over here, a TI-89T costs $40-50 higher than a TI-Nspire CX and online$30 higher than the Nspire CX CAS.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2013, 03:12:35 am by DJ Omnimaga »

#### Lionel Debroux

• LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
• Posts: 2135
• Rating: +290/-45
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #20 on: June 01, 2013, 03:13:23 am »
Despite being more powerful, the TI-68k series has always been far less popular than the TI-Z80 series, due to the CAS, forbidden in many standardized tests worldwide, and the higher price tags (even before the Nspire existed). The TI-68k series got fairly popular in France, thanks to the lack of such silly bans on CAS.

Though there have been a number of interesting programs since then, the TI-68k native code programming community saw a massive, final plunge in 2006-2007. It was therefore unrelated to advent of the Nspire (at that time), which became programmable through native code for the general public only in late February 2010.
The dive of the TI-68k native code programming community can be attributed to a number of factors, let's mention at least four of them:
* as I wrote in another topic, evolution of the library and documentation were indeed low because the maintainer actively or passively refused many contributions that were deemed useful by users. Until 2008, there was still some work in other areas. GCC4TI picked up where TIGCC left, fixing bugs, processing some of that backlog of contributions (well, at least, those which were published - we know that some contributions have been lost forever), performing new optimizations in the library, and highly improving the maintainability and portability of the very badly-behaved build system inherited from TIGCC. Little gets done on GCC4TI nowadays, due to the extremely low number of users, but at least, GCC4TI can be built straight from Git, while building TIGCC is pretty hard;
* constant criticism against many projects that could have created more activity, and general disrespect, combined to overly lax moderation (or unfair moderation, when the main troublemaker was the so-called moderator), produced horrible mood on what used to be the main message boards of the TI-68k community, which took a toll on the community. The alternative languages for the TI-68k series, e.g. NewProg (which is close enough in spirit to Axe and predates it by years), or the GTC alternative toolchain, were constantly dissed, or even saw their progress actively hampered through non-technical matters, by the TIGCC maintainer;
* over the years, old-timers of the community moved on to other platforms / interests, until (though it was possibly rather 2008 than 2006-2007 ?) very few old-timers remained really productive;
* newcomers have rarefied due to technical advances, which helped paint calculators for the overpriced pieces of obsolete software / hardware that they are (calculators lost their "first programming platform in students' hands" aspect), and also due to changes in society (there has been a real drop in new graduates in scientific matters - after all, scientific matters are far less valued, though indispensable in the long run, to marketing and finance, so why would people choose lower-wages jobs ?). The Nspire's low programmability and general orientation towards consuming knowledge than producing code, reduces the number of persons which discover programming through the calculator.

In Nspire times (2010+), besides the aforementioned reasons, most of which have remained valid, the TI-68k community didn't pick back up because of TI actively pushing the Nspire instead, through insane price tags and completely dropping support for the TI-68k series (since 2003 for the 89 & 92+, 2005 for the V200 & 89T).

Also, I'd like to mention something about the ticalc.org POTY possibility, which was mentioned by pimathbrainiac above. It's true that it's easier to get a ticalc.org POTY nowadays, especially in that category, but it's not a good thing, or not necessarily because nothing else gets done.
ticalc.org has lost a lot of momentum over the years, due to a chicken-and-egg problem. Reduced newsing activity (despite the addition of a staff member), and upload + update forms that are not on par with those of other sites (I'm being lazy to upload TILP II 1.17 and associated programs due to exactly that...), produce fewer file uploads to ticalc.org, and lower newsing activity...
* in 2010, I received an unexpected POTY, because one of my creations was the only one mentioned in that category over the whole year, though definitely not the only possible one (Benjamin Moody's titools sprang to my mind at the time), and probably not even the most interesting or (potentially) useful one. While novel, and not even that time-consuming, tiosmod+amspatch have seen little use in the wild, for legal reasons: we can't redistribute ready-made modified OS images, so users have to perform manual operations (compiling, or downloading binary patchers and applying the provided binary patches). Anyhow, I didn't spend time on this old idea of mine until 2010, leading to a far too belated tiosmod+amspatch release.
* in the Nspire category, the 2012 POTY vote was significantly truncated by the fact that like half of the important programs of the year were not uploaded to ticalc.org in the first place, or for those which were, no news was posted about them on ticalc.org (despite being featured on Omnimaga, TI-Planet and/or Cemetech).

Oh, and I missed something on the previous page:
Quote
But native-code programs can't be larger than 24K; that's a bummer.
The artificial size limitation on ASM programs was added by the AMS 2.xx series in 1999, at first 8 KB, and later raised to 24 KB. However, it's so weak a "protection" that it was immediately defeated, before the 21st century
"ASAP or Exec string too long" and "Invalid Program Reference" have always been useless in practice, neither has prevented large ASM programs or math ASM programs in any kind of significant way. Both are killed by all "kernels", as well as tiosmod+amspatch.
On the TI-Z80 series, until recent discoveries, ASM programs were also limited to 8 KB.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2013, 08:26:08 am by Lionel Debroux »
Member of the TI-Chess Team.
Co-maintainer of GCC4TI (GCC4TI online documentation), TILP and TIEmu.

#### XiiDraco

• LV7 Elite (Next: 700)
• Posts: 513
• Rating: +32/-5
• Forget the numbers, just call me, Recreation.
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2013, 01:23:29 pm »
Ok, I'll just stick with Ps Vita. :|
« Last Edit: June 01, 2013, 01:23:55 pm by XiiR3CR34T10N »

#### Sorunome

• Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox Fox!
• Support Staff
• LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
• Posts: 7920
• Rating: +374/-13
• Derpy Hooves
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2013, 03:25:04 pm »
But is it just me or is the 68k series getting more popularity nowadays, I have the feeling that more people get 'em (maybe it is just me paying more attention to who has one because i have one now too?)

And DJ:
On ebay i got my TI89 (non-titanium) for \$52.
 THE GAMEAlso, check out my websiteIf OmnomIRC is screwed up, blame me!Click here to give me an internet!

#### DJ Omnimaga

• Former TI programmer
• CoT Emeritus
• LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
• Posts: 55910
• Rating: +3152/-232
• CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
##### Re: Top-down shooter - 83+/84+ or 89/Ti?
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2013, 08:14:06 pm »
Yeah I meant in retail stores or from official online retailers and brand new. As for their popularity I think every good coder leaving back in the days due to the KK drama left a huge gap with no people making the platform interesting. It is possible that if a lot of new coders arrive that more people might be interested about it. That's, of course, as long as TI continues selling the calc, but the price won't help, considering at most places you can get a color screen calc for the same price or less.