Author Topic: SourceForge VS Google Code  (Read 12951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2010, 07:51:14 pm »
Well, I agree with calcdude84se about the simplicity of things. People often make simple things and then provide huge websites with a lot of unnecessary stuff... sometimes the website is greater than the actual product... so, keeping it simple looks like the best thing. If you want to move it up a nudge,then big websites may be the best options.

By the way, your signature... I'll do Farmville.

Offline gangsterveggies

  • LV2 Member (Next: 40)
  • **
  • Posts: 36
  • Rating: +2/-1
  • Asm rules
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2010, 07:53:20 pm »
Too late...
I'm waiting for someone to do a calc Farmville. Maybe one day I'll do it!

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2010, 07:57:10 pm »
Too late...

What's the matter? It wouldn't be hard :)

Offline Lionel Debroux

  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2135
  • Rating: +290/-45
    • View Profile
    • TI-Chess Team
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2010, 04:30:19 am »
Yeah, Google Code is simpler / less powerful than SourceForge. And as SirCmpwn seemed to mention, SF is a better choice than Codeplex (whose TFS is a bad SCM with bad interoperability).
Member of the TI-Chess Team.
Co-maintainer of GCC4TI (GCC4TI online documentation), TILP and TIEmu.
Co-admin of TI-Planet.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2010, 09:16:38 am »
Yeah, Google Code is simpler / less powerful than SourceForge. And as SirCmpwn seemed to mention, SF is a better choice than Codeplex (whose TFS is a bad SCM with bad interoperability).

So...

Looking for:      Use:
Simple             Google Code
Easy

Looking for:     Go for:
Complex          SourceForge
Powerful
Featured

Offline calcdude84se

  • Needs Motivation
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2272
  • Rating: +78/-13
  • Wondering where their free time went...
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2010, 09:56:29 am »
The main difference between SF and Google Code is one of power vs. simplicity.
SF provides a powerful interface for developers, more so than Google Code.
Google Code, on the other hand, just has you type a few things in and you have a project. It has much less of a learning curve than SF, but it is less powerful.
So, if you have time, I recommend trying to get more used to SF before you just throw it off as "quite.. confusing" :)
I personally am using Google Code because I feel that I don't need everything that SF can provide; I just want decent hosting with version control. Sir seems to think differently. :)

As for similar ones, I don't know of any off the top of my head :/ SF and Google Code are the two main ones.
Exactly what I said in my first reply, but I think your summary is easier to read ;D
"People think computers will keep them from making mistakes. They're wrong. With computers you make mistakes faster."
-Adam Osborne
Spoiler For "PartesOS links":
I'll put it online when it does something.

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2010, 09:57:11 am »
The main difference between SF and Google Code is one of power vs. simplicity.
SF provides a powerful interface for developers, more so than Google Code.
Google Code, on the other hand, just has you type a few things in and you have a project. It has much less of a learning curve than SF, but it is less powerful.
So, if you have time, I recommend trying to get more used to SF before you just throw it off as "quite.. confusing" :)
I personally am using Google Code because I feel that I don't need everything that SF can provide; I just want decent hosting with version control. Sir seems to think differently. :)

As for similar ones, I don't know of any off the top of my head :/ SF and Google Code are the two main ones.
Exactly what I said in my first reply, but I think your summary is easier to read ;D

Yup, I am trying CodeFlex and SourceForge at the moment :)

Offline ExtendeD

  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV8 Addict (Next: 1000)
  • *
  • Posts: 825
  • Rating: +167/-2
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2010, 03:42:21 pm »
What about Launchpad?
Ndless.me with the finest TI-Nspire programs

Offline calcdude84se

  • Needs Motivation
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2272
  • Rating: +78/-13
  • Wondering where their free time went...
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2010, 03:46:43 pm »
Okay, I think the point has been made that there are a lot ;D
Wikipedia has a long list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities
"People think computers will keep them from making mistakes. They're wrong. With computers you make mistakes faster."
-Adam Osborne
Spoiler For "PartesOS links":
I'll put it online when it does something.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2010, 03:53:36 pm »
There are ways around that ;) (such as editing the first post or having a separate release topic). And besides, for Google Code, SF, and others, it's not too hard to add downloads :) (in my case, I do plan to offer downloads that way ;))

I mean, look at KnightOS or Axe, they have their own forum or subforum, so it's easy to have multiple threads, one for downloads and updates, other for general discussion.

But not all programs have a subforum, even though, most of the ones which don't have a subforum, don't need a subforum and consequently don't need a website, so everything is OK.
Isn't it better if people can discuss about it on the forums, though? It creates activity on calculator forums and attract more members. It's good to have a topic or a website with all available downloads, though. Also, if ParteOS ever take off, it may eventually get its own sub-forum on Omni as well the next time I get to add new ones.

By the way, where would Codeplex stand among SourceForge and Google Code? Is it any better or worse than both and does it have advantages/disadvantages?
« Last Edit: November 28, 2010, 03:54:23 pm by DJ Omnimaga »
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2010, 03:58:32 pm »

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #26 on: November 28, 2010, 04:00:22 pm »
Just noticed that too, I didn't thought there were that many similar sites around. I guess it's good to use the ones that have been around for a while, though, in case newer ones would shut down or something due to lower popularity/ad revenues.
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #27 on: November 28, 2010, 04:01:48 pm »
Just noticed that too, I didn't thought there were that many similar sites around. I guess it's good to use the ones that have been around for a while, though, in case newer ones would shut down or something due to lower popularity/ad revenues.

Yes, there are lots of them, but Google Code and SourceForge are better if you're looking for popularity, mainly Google Code which appears in the first results of Google :)

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #28 on: November 28, 2010, 04:03:05 pm »
Ah, right. I guess SF also does. You get more traffic that way too.

But yeah, even if you use those sites, I think it's a good idea to also showcase your project on forums that are similarly themed. For example, calc forums. More people will be interested.
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

SirCmpwn

  • Guest
Re: SourceForge VS Google Code
« Reply #29 on: November 28, 2010, 10:49:43 pm »
By the way, Codeplex also supports SVN, if you think TFS sucks (which I don't).  They both integrate, so a SVN check in shows up on TFS.