Author Topic: Progress of "M" (Read 87848 times)

metagross111 · « **Reply #120 on:** November 17, 2008, 07:03:46 pm »

meh, fooey on youtube >:[

calc84maniac · « **Reply #121 on:** November 20, 2008, 11:30:21 am »

I made a new Youtube video of my progress!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i50pu2SkINg

metagross111 · « **Reply #122 on:** November 20, 2008, 05:25:12 pm »

that was not, cool.....

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #123 on:** November 20, 2008, 06:24:28 pm »

FUCK

not again ;.;

you got me here

metagross111 · « **Reply #124 on:** November 20, 2008, 06:54:40 pm »

i would be banned for saying ****

fugot · « **Reply #125 on:** December 04, 2008, 07:44:33 pm »

any more progress?

metagross111 · « **Reply #126 on:** December 04, 2008, 08:16:35 pm »

nah, calc84maniac's been pretty quiet recently

calc84maniac · « **Reply #127 on:** December 05, 2008, 01:12:27 am »

Well, technically I've been improving the graphics routines (i.e. the tilemapper and sprite routines). I've been avoiding having to work with hills...

necro · « **Reply #128 on:** December 05, 2008, 04:37:32 am »

is it grid based or triangle based? Also are the slopes always .5 or are there other slope ratios

calc84maniac · « **Reply #129 on:** December 05, 2008, 11:52:57 am »

It's grid-based, but it calls the tile collision callbacks each frame so I can customize the collision if I need to. (You know, check the coordinates of the object and see if it collided with the slope

)

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #130 on:** December 05, 2008, 03:20:35 pm »

i wouldnt want to mess with slopes, it must be very hard to code

, I don't recall seeing any SMB clone/pirate game for calc/PC respectively that had working slopes. Usually those that handled them did it in a glitchy way, especially the sliding

I also noticed you haven't been around much lately, same for Necro

necro · « **Reply #131 on:** December 05, 2008, 03:40:46 pm »

I've been finishing up my course work and getting reay for my exams for the quarter

if its grid based, would a lookup table be quicker than actualy trying to do the math?

metagross111 · « **Reply #132 on:** December 05, 2008, 05:29:39 pm »

in pure basic terms, i can sort of see how it can be coded.

but beyond that i dont think it would be terribly hard >_>

calc84maniac · « **Reply #133 on:** December 06, 2008, 01:39:25 pm »

It already uses a LUT for the tile callbacks, and the math is quite simple... it just has to take the position collided within the tile and compare the x and y coordinates. Right now I even have it so that it makes sure his head won't go through a block when he's going up a hill.

However, there is a bit of a glitch that happens with objects 8 pixels high... and I'm pretty sure what it is, too.

In other news, I updated his horizontal acceleration code to make it more accurate to the originals: when he's jumping, he does not accelerate or decelerate unless you press an arrow key. He used to go back to zero velocity just like he was on the ground.

metagross111 · « **Reply #134 on:** December 06, 2008, 09:11:27 pm »

Author Topic: Progress of "M" (Read 87848 times)

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"

calc84maniac

Re: Progress of "M"

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"

DJ Omnimaga

Re: Progress of "M"

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"

fugot

Re: Progress of "M"

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"

calc84maniac

Re: Progress of "M"

necro

Re: Progress of "M"

calc84maniac

Re: Progress of "M"

DJ Omnimaga

Re: Progress of "M"

necro

Re: Progress of "M"

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"

calc84maniac

Re: Progress of "M"

metagross111

Re: Progress of "M"