Author Topic: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM (Read 4446 times)

flyingfisch · « **on:** January 06, 2012, 03:57:28 pm »

I dont have a prizm, but if someone would like to post the seconds it takes for prizm to finish the 9-queens problem (code below) we could compare its speed to other calcs

Code: [Select]

10->J
Lbl 2
1.0000001->A
A->B
27->I
Lbl 1
A*A->A
B^2.01->B
Dsz I:Goto 1
Dsz J:Goto 2
"A=":A,
"B=":B,

AngelFish · « **Reply #1 on:** January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm »

2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models

Nick · « **Reply #2 on:** January 06, 2012, 04:22:00 pm »

could it be that this takes only 1.0 seconds on the TI-Nspire

(variates from 0.7-1.2)

flyingfisch · « **Reply #3 on:** January 06, 2012, 05:12:17 pm »

Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm

2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models

Isnt it possible to overclock the PRIZM?

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #4 on:** January 06, 2012, 07:01:19 pm »

Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm

2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models

Wow... there definitively needs a third-party OS for the Prizm... maybe Kerm can convince AHelper to start prizm programming and make GlassOS for the Prizm too?

flyingfisch · « **Reply #5 on:** January 06, 2012, 07:32:09 pm »

Quote from: DJ_O on January 06, 2012, 07:01:19 pm

Quote from: Qwerty.55 on January 06, 2012, 04:12:30 pm
2.5 seconds for my prizm. I also did a run with 10 trials and averaged it to get basically the same answer.

This means, of course, that Casio somehow managed to slow down their code so much that doubling the clock frequency resulted in a calculator only *slightly* slower than the old models

Wow... there definitively needs a third-party OS for the Prizm... maybe Kerm can convince AHelper to start prizm programming and make GlassOS for the Prizm too?

Enter Project FixOS

DJ Omnimaga · « **Reply #6 on:** January 19, 2012, 09:13:43 pm »

Yeah I saw that one. Hopefully this comes to fruition eventually.

Author Topic: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM (Read 4446 times)

flyingfisch

9 Queens problem... PRIZM

AngelFish

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM

Nick

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM

flyingfisch

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM

DJ Omnimaga

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM

flyingfisch

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM

DJ Omnimaga

Re: 9 Queens problem... PRIZM