« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison  (Read 3198 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« on: March 15, 2011, 02:29:51 am »
On Planet-Casio, someone wrote a table comparing the speed between BASIC commands on the 9860GII, PRIZM and Casio's first flash calc series.

Basically a command is ran inside a For 1->Z to 999/For(Z,1,999 style loop and the table shows the amount of seconds it took to execute. It might be approximative in some cases, but it should give you an idea of how the speed compare between the 3 calc series.

http://www.planet-casio.com/files/forums/VitesseFonctionsCasio-9648.zip

Source: http://www.planet-casio.com/Fr/forums/lecture_sujet.php?id=9648&page=1#52365

I have no clue what is the with and without column thing, though.
Logged
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

Offline Munchor

  • LV13 Extreme Addict (Next: 9001)
  • *************
  • Posts: 6199
  • Rating: +295/-121
  • Code Recycler
    • View Profile
Re: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2011, 03:39:29 pm »
Is this like Runer112's cycles table for Axe? Looks hard work.
Logged

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2011, 03:42:29 pm »
Kinda, but not in clock cycles, more in amount of times an instruction executed per second. The AFX is the slowest of all, but it's older and has a much slower processor. It's a shame the Prizm isn't any faster than the 9860G, though...
Logged
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2011, 03:43:39 pm »
It looks like the Prizm is slightly faster in math and much slower in everything else than the 9860gII. That's a shame, because it's probably the result of programming more than anything else.
Logged
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Clacualters are teh gr33t
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55942
  • Rating: +3154/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • Dream of Omnimaga Music
Re: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2011, 03:46:09 pm »
Actually even in math it's slightly slower, according to this.
Logged
Now active at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF (CodeWalrus server)

Offline AngelFish

  • Is this my custom title?
  • Administrator
  • LV12 Extreme Poster (Next: 5000)
  • ************
  • Posts: 3242
  • Rating: +270/-27
  • I'm a Fishbot
    • View Profile
Re: 9860GII<>PRIZM<>AFX BASIC speed comparison
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2011, 03:47:47 pm »
I don't know where I was looking then...

'tis a pity.
Logged
∂²Ψ    -(2m(V(x)-E)Ψ
---  = -------------
∂x²        ℏ²Ψ
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »