Author Topic: Raidcall  (Read 2159 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nikitouzz

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 215
  • Rating: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Raidcall
« on: January 30, 2014, 05:56:58 am »
Someone is on raidcall ? il plya musique on raidcall a lot of time !
mes records personels :

2x2x2 : 2.18 secondes / 2x2x2 une main : 21.15 secondes / 2x2x2 yeux bandés : 47.59
3x3x3 : 5.97 secondes / 3x3x3 une main : 49.86 secondes
4x4x4 : 1.49 minutes / 4x4x4 une main : 6.50 minutes
5x5x5 : 4.10 minutes / 5x5x5 une main : 18.02 minutes
6x6x6 : 8.10 minutes
7x7x7 : 16.03 minutes
9x9x9 : 58.26 minutes

megaminx : 5.59 minutes / pyraminx : 7.91 secondes / square-one : 1.07 minutes

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Now active at https://codewalr.us
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55816
  • Rating: +3151/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • CodeWalrus
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2014, 08:52:38 pm »
I have no clue what is raidcall ???
In case you are wondering where I went, I left Omni back in 2015 to form CodeWalrus due to various reasons explained back then, but I stopped calc dev in 2016 and am now mostly active on the CW Discord server at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF


Bandcamp|Reverbnation|Facebook|Youtube|Twitter

Offline nikitouzz

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 215
  • Rating: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2014, 06:08:12 am »
Google is your friends haha jk :p ! but raidcall is as skype without vidéo !
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 07:48:51 am by nikitouzz »
mes records personels :

2x2x2 : 2.18 secondes / 2x2x2 une main : 21.15 secondes / 2x2x2 yeux bandés : 47.59
3x3x3 : 5.97 secondes / 3x3x3 une main : 49.86 secondes
4x4x4 : 1.49 minutes / 4x4x4 une main : 6.50 minutes
5x5x5 : 4.10 minutes / 5x5x5 une main : 18.02 minutes
6x6x6 : 8.10 minutes
7x7x7 : 16.03 minutes
9x9x9 : 58.26 minutes

megaminx : 5.59 minutes / pyraminx : 7.91 secondes / square-one : 1.07 minutes

Offline DJ Omnimaga

  • Now active at https://codewalr.us
  • CoT Emeritus
  • LV15 Omnimagician (Next: --)
  • *
  • Posts: 55816
  • Rating: +3151/-232
  • CodeWalrus founder & retired Omnimaga founder
    • View Profile
    • CodeWalrus
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2014, 09:27:57 am »
Oh ok, over here in North America the most popular ones are Skype, Teamspeak and Ventrilo. Tinychat and Google Hangout are popular as well, but the first is slow and requires Flash and the second has cross-browser compatibility issues.
In case you are wondering where I went, I left Omni back in 2015 to form CodeWalrus due to various reasons explained back then, but I stopped calc dev in 2016 and am now mostly active on the CW Discord server at https://discord.gg/cuZcfcF


Bandcamp|Reverbnation|Facebook|Youtube|Twitter

Offline nikitouzz

  • LV5 Advanced (Next: 300)
  • *****
  • Posts: 215
  • Rating: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2014, 03:10:27 pm »
I use ventrilo too for the music !
mes records personels :

2x2x2 : 2.18 secondes / 2x2x2 une main : 21.15 secondes / 2x2x2 yeux bandés : 47.59
3x3x3 : 5.97 secondes / 3x3x3 une main : 49.86 secondes
4x4x4 : 1.49 minutes / 4x4x4 une main : 6.50 minutes
5x5x5 : 4.10 minutes / 5x5x5 une main : 18.02 minutes
6x6x6 : 8.10 minutes
7x7x7 : 16.03 minutes
9x9x9 : 58.26 minutes

megaminx : 5.59 minutes / pyraminx : 7.91 secondes / square-one : 1.07 minutes

Offline bb010g

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 427
  • Rating: +22/-1
  • I do stuff
    • View Profile
    • elsewhere on the net
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2014, 08:20:03 pm »
I personally prefer Mumble as it's open source and lightweight.
Arch Linux user
Haskell newbie | Warming up to Lua | Being dragged into C++
Calculators: HP 35s, Casio Prizm, TI-Nspire CX CAS, HP-28s, HP Prime, Mathematica 9 (if that counts)
π: 3.14...; l: 108; i: 105; e: 101; l+i+e: 314
THE CAKE IS A LIE IS A PIE

Offline shmibs

  • しらす丼
  • Administrator
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2132
  • Rating: +281/-3
  • try to be ok, ok?
    • View Profile
    • shmibbles.me
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2014, 08:40:00 pm »
mumble is lightweight? i've never been able to run it on anything without big load spikes. even on my haswell i7 it runs at about 4% cpu utilisation.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 08:40:13 pm by shmibs »

Offline bb010g

  • LV6 Super Member (Next: 500)
  • ******
  • Posts: 427
  • Rating: +22/-1
  • I do stuff
    • View Profile
    • elsewhere on the net
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2014, 08:56:20 pm »
I can run it with Murmur and Portal 2 just fine on an about 2009 HP laptop for multiplayer with pretty good graphics.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2014, 08:56:35 pm by bb010g »
Arch Linux user
Haskell newbie | Warming up to Lua | Being dragged into C++
Calculators: HP 35s, Casio Prizm, TI-Nspire CX CAS, HP-28s, HP Prime, Mathematica 9 (if that counts)
π: 3.14...; l: 108; i: 105; e: 101; l+i+e: 314
THE CAKE IS A LIE IS A PIE

Offline shmibs

  • しらす丼
  • Administrator
  • LV11 Super Veteran (Next: 3000)
  • ***********
  • Posts: 2132
  • Rating: +281/-3
  • try to be ok, ok?
    • View Profile
    • shmibbles.me
Re: Raidcall
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2014, 09:09:45 pm »
sure, it can run fine alongside other things. what i meant, though, was that it seems odd for a chat program to be as much of a resource hog as it is. even when it's not doing any audio streaming at all i still see load like i mentioned above.