0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
EDIT: And to clarify, the purpose of Axe Fusion was to result in smaller compiled programs. It was not intended to increase either compiling or execution speed.
Of course, since they are plain text that gets interpreted. Just try to compile a Grammer program in the ASM resulting of its interpretation and then we'll can talk.
Bien sûr que si que ça sert de comparer, on présente souvent la page d'application Grammer nécessaire pour exécuter des programmes Grammer comme un inconvénient, il est donc juste de montrer que les programmes sont d'un autre côté bien plus légers et qu'avec pas mal de programmes, la balance penche bien vite du bon côté.
Quote from: Runer112 on May 13, 2013, 01:15:33 pmEDIT: And to clarify, the purpose of Axe Fusion was to result in smaller compiled programs. It was not intended to increase either compiling or execution speed.Ah ? I thought it was about compiling speed. Yeah, can be useful too to have smaller progs if you have a lot of projects.
Quote from: Matrefeytontias on May 13, 2013, 01:17:43 pmOf course, since they are plain text that gets interpreted. Just try to compile a Grammer program in the ASM resulting of its interpretation and then we'll can talk.Did you only read this post ? https://tiplanet.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=11837&start=10#p140313QuoteBien sûr que si que ça sert de comparer, on présente souvent la page d'application Grammer nécessaire pour exécuter des programmes Grammer comme un inconvénient, il est donc juste de montrer que les programmes sont d'un autre côté bien plus légers et qu'avec pas mal de programmes, la balance penche bien vite du bon côté.
Yeah, so everyone codes in Basic, that is the language that saves the most space. You don't even need an external app to start saving space, the OS runs them natively.
Overall, the one thing I like best about Grammer is that you can make programs as quickly as you can in BASIC. If you test the program and you need to change something, just press ON to break the program, edit the code, and run it again-- no need to compile the source. It is also why I like programming in hexadecimal. It is often more efficient for how quickly you can program something.However, if you need something to be really fast, I would go with Axe since it is highly efficient and a lot faster to code in than Assembly (if you are used to Axe).
Yeah, I know all of that, and I have nothing against Grammer (also, if Grammer gets ported on the CSE before Axe, I'll use it instead ), I was just telling mdr1 that his arguments were not good.
None of those assumptions are false. But the first one doesn't apply since Grammer programs are not in a high number (don't know why btw, Grammer has as much potential as Axe, maybe just because it came after Axe).
BASIC programs are smaller than Axe, but the data they use is horribly massive. This is why in many cases a BASIC game will end up way larger than its ASM counterpart.
Author
Topic: [grammer] Problem with trigonometry (Read 18211 times)
