This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Xeda112358
1
« on: December 15, 2021, 08:13:45 am »
I'm thinking it might be an order-of-operations issue since Axe obeys parentheses, but is otherwise left-to-right instead of PEMDAS.
Instead of this:
If (RoomX≥XMin and RoomX≤XMax) and (RoomY≥YMin and RoomY≤YMax)
0→R
GetRoomStart()
End
!If (RoomX≥XMin and RoomX≤XMax) and (RoomY≥YMin and RoomY≤YMax)
R++
End
Try:
If (RoomX≥XMin) and (RoomX≤XMax) and (RoomY≥YMin) and (RoomY≤YMax)
0→R
GetRoomStart()
Else
R++
End
2
« on: December 09, 2021, 07:39:39 pm »
The code is difficult to follow, but it looks like you are mixing 0-indexing and 1-indexing.
You loop J from 1 to Rooms, but then you are checking if J>0 in the same loop (which is always true).
J+(J*((J>0)*4))-4→Y
Simplifies to:
J+(J*(1*4))-4→Y
J+(J*4)-4→Y
J*5-4→Y
Maybe there is something there?
3
« on: December 07, 2021, 07:16:27 am »
That is amazing :0
4
« on: November 25, 2021, 02:01:27 pm »
Could it be that I used WabbitSign? Should I use something else to sign the app?
I haven't used wabbitsign in a long time and I'm not sure if that is the issue. I generally use spasm and I've got it configured to automatically sign apps. I know Wabbitemu is very generous with loading apps (it bypasses the calc's security which is great for streamlining development, but it hides signing issues). I'm not much help with this stuff these ays  .__.
5
« on: November 25, 2021, 07:58:34 am »
I cannot send the 8xk file to my 84+. I get an error saying the application file is broken and to redownload it again, and if it doesn't work, to contact TI for help. 
Out of curiosity, can you send it to an emulator?
6
« on: November 13, 2021, 08:10:25 am »
Holy heck that looks so good :O
7
« on: November 07, 2021, 06:35:35 am »
Oh yeah, that definitely works :0
8
« on: October 23, 2021, 04:03:12 pm »
Awww yiss, that looks pretty cool!
I definitely like the monochrome graphics (I also find that grayscale is just too rough to look at on actual hardware and with moving images).
9
« on: October 11, 2021, 12:32:17 pm »
Oh, fantastic! Good catch!
10
« on: September 11, 2021, 12:16:59 pm »
That is absolutely amazing, and especially for having been done in TI-BASIC 
11
« on: September 02, 2021, 06:49:34 am »
Woah, happy birthday Omni! 
12
« on: June 25, 2021, 04:57:29 pm »
If M is less than 192, then M-192 will wrap back around to be >=65344.
Is that possibly the issue ? If so, and if Z is small enough, then you can probably change it to compare M with Z+128 instead.
13
« on: June 18, 2021, 06:35:59 pm »
Wow, that's really neat. I don't have a use for that at the moment but I bet I can find one in some old, slow code.
How did you go about making the routine generator? I assume there are some simple rules it follows.
It looks through all the numbers 1-65535 to find some good code. If the number is even, it essentially uses the code for n/2, but with an `add hl,hl` tacked on to the end. Otherwise it is odd and it first tries a shift-and-add algorithm (basically the classic, generic multiplication, but unrolled and with branches removed as we know which path it takes in advance). It registers whatever code it came up with, then it checks if it is faster or smaller to multiply by the factors (for example, it is faster to multiply by 27 by doing *3*9 or *9*3), so it finds all of the factors and checks for anything more efficient. There are other tricks, too, like checking if it is faster to "negate" (i.e., *65535 is the same as *-1), and if there is a *(2^k-1) with k>3, it uses a subtraction. And it collapse things like 8 `add hl,hl` into `ld h,l \ ld l,0`, and has some pre-populated routines in the table. It doesn't really know anything about the instruction set, so it can't do any fancy optimizations 
14
« on: June 18, 2021, 05:19:34 pm »
I wrote a program to generate 16-bit multiplication-by-constant routines. It isn't perfect, but it probably produced optimal code for a lot of them! The attached tar.xz file has the (undocumented) program and a 28.8MB file of routines  For example, it has these two routines for mul_hl_1337: mul_hl_1337: ; size optimized
;17 bytes, 173cc
ld b,h
ld c,l
add hl,hl
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
add hl,hl
add hl,hl
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
add hl,hl
add hl,hl
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
mul_hl_1337: ; speed optimized
;25 bytes, 148cc
ld b,h
ld c,l
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
ld b,h
ld c,l
add hl,hl
add hl,bc
ld a,h
ld h,l
rra
rr h
rra
rr h
rra
and 11000000b
ld l,a
or a
sbc hl,bc
15
« on: June 04, 2021, 09:25:57 pm »
That is probably the simplest and fastest method and shouldn't slow it down much, but there might be order-of-operations issues, so you might need: If (A>(X-8)) and (A<(X+8))
Alternatively: If (A-X>-8) and (A-X<8)
But for Axe, that can probably be optimized to: If A-X+7 < 15
(This is taking advantage of "negative" numbers actually being really large, so you don't need to make sure A-X+7>=0. If it was "smaller" than zero, it would actually be around 65000 which is not less than 15 )
|
Show Posts