This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Nick
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 80
106
« on: January 09, 2013, 11:57:33 am »
Did you read my whole sentence? I said this will not work with this script
107
« on: January 09, 2013, 07:20:09 am »
Ok. But you can use the chipmunks physic program include in OS 3.2 or no?
Yes. You put require 'physics' on the top of your script.
But this will not work with this script, not at all. You'll have to write your own script for that, I guess you should read this.
108
« on: January 09, 2013, 02:16:53 am »
I t sure is, i even thought the first one was the original  It's exactly the same colors, congratz 
109
« on: January 09, 2013, 02:13:18 am »
I know, but have you read the terms and conditions of the .bf extension? It's Burkina Faso, and they seem to have very strict rules about what is allowed and what not. And .bf is also used for file ending of brainf*ck files >.>
That's the reason why it would be so cool I wouldn't know what the url should be then though. I won't do it, I don't have brainf*ck knowledge, and I don't have website programming knowledge...
110
« on: January 08, 2013, 03:42:50 pm »
It looks great although I would consider an RTC, that might come in handy.. do you use millis() now? I like the simplicity of it, how you can do anything with only 3 (!) buttons
111
« on: January 08, 2013, 03:40:35 pm »
I had this incredible idea today, maybe someone could setup a website like
learn.bf or something, or brainfuck.bf (although i'm afraid that one wouldn't be allowed)
I saw the extension .bf, and thought of brainf*ck immediatly xp
112
« on: January 08, 2013, 01:29:20 pm »
Don't you use an RTC?
113
« on: January 08, 2013, 01:19:16 pm »
Sad news: This early prototype is not self-contained. Which means: There is simply not enough space for batteries. The cr2032 cannot supply enough current and they drain rapidly, so this is what I came up with: A small cable to a battery 
That's a nice solution, the battery will still be attached to the wathc I guess/hope? It's kinda inevitable that it consumes a 'lot' of power, but have you thought about some kind of sleep function? As you can see here you can save a lot of working time by simply putting it into sleep, together with dimming the backlight. Or have you already done so?
114
« on: January 08, 2013, 01:14:25 pm »
Good work. But it's very slow on calc :-(
I know, that's the sad part about it, you may even call it disturbing/frustrating/horrible/throw-your-calc-out-of-the-window slow... but there's nothing I/we can do about it, I don't think I can really optimise the code
115
« on: January 08, 2013, 12:15:30 pm »
I think I'm better with a single image per map (that doesn't mean I can't change my mind tho, if I optimize my program to go fast enough maybe I'll have both speed and lightness).
So you mean like a different image for every track? won't that be a lot of wasted space? And you'll need an additional array/structure that overlays the track on the image, which could go wrong if there's some misplacing of the overlapping.
116
« on: January 08, 2013, 12:11:01 pm »
I love it, and I will definitely use it for my upcoming progs, thanks for that
117
« on: January 08, 2013, 12:09:09 pm »
Sounds interesting, any one have a video?
A video of the chipmunk engine? Well, if you have the student software a handheld, you could try the code Jim posted above (they're really nice tbh) @Nick My eat nethams game seems to run somewhat faster on 3.2 than it did on 3.1. The lobsters definitely fall smoother when setting it to the 100% spawn rate. It's not much of an improvement, but to me it seems to be something like 5-10%. It also could be I'm just imagining it, sadly I do not own 2 CXes so I can't test :p
That's what I hoped, that it would be faster, but still pff, I guess we could never expect it to be superlightningthunderboltfast, but at least a little afster than now xs but yeah, any improvement is nice..
118
« on: January 08, 2013, 12:07:07 pm »
It's up to the mainstream and the businesses. Whatever works best for them. No, people want to continue using software they're already used to.
Best example: All I can tell you is that I run win8, and I use it exactly the same as win7.
Heeey, that's my quote xp yeah, you're right. They're too late.. Same goes for the upcoming new blackberry OS fot touch screen devices. They were enormously popular back in 2000-2008, when touch wasn't really a hype, but they lost clients because everyone thought touch was better, and now they'll have a hard time to win back the old clients, because they're alreay used to other interfaces than the blackberry one
119
« on: January 08, 2013, 02:37:43 am »
hmm, too late.. I'll post it anyways. I suddenly remebered a couple of minutes ago, but didn't see the post yet, so here it is 
120
« on: January 08, 2013, 02:36:09 am »
(I just tried your .tns -> it's so cool on TINCS that you will be making everyone lose time :x lol congratz)
how do you mean lose time? We should try to make it with chipmunk too and see how it compares to your code, speed-wise, on TINCS it probably will be the same, on the device I don't know.
It'll be way better, I'm sure of that, but I never tried chipmunk on calc (still 3.1)
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 80
|
Show Posts
