2671
TI Z80 / Re: Partex 2
« on: December 30, 2011, 06:57:55 pm »
Thanks! And yes, my avatar is made in Grammer code. It was actually made a while before I made a command to turn on pixels in a region to particles.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2671
TI Z80 / Re: Partex 2« on: December 30, 2011, 06:57:55 pm »
Thanks! And yes, my avatar is made in Grammer code. It was actually made a while before I made a command to turn on pixels in a region to particles.
2673
News / Re: Ticalc publishes 2011 POTY results« on: December 30, 2011, 09:14:54 am »
Now I need to see what I can come up with for this coming year
![]() 2674
TI Z80 / Re: ASMDREAM - the TI-8X+ on-calc assembler« on: December 30, 2011, 09:13:53 am »
If you can, that would be cool, but it isn't necessary
![]() 2675
Grammer / Re: Grammer Feature Requests« on: December 30, 2011, 09:09:54 am »
Ironically, I have that half working
![]() 2676
Grammer / Re: Grammer Feature Requests« on: December 29, 2011, 08:52:45 pm »
For number 2, you can do that if it is in RAM, but any labels that come after that will need to be recalibrated.
For number 3, if you have a token for it, that is already possible, but I am thinking I can add in the RecallPic and StoPic commands that access all 256 pictures and maybe a solve( command to play with strings and GDBs and whatnot. 2677
Grammer / Re: Grammer Q&A« on: December 29, 2011, 07:52:53 pm »
Okay, I made the topic and the first post should have the program that works.
2678
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: December 29, 2011, 07:52:06 pm »![]() In any event, the safest way is just to do the code I showed. You can do some really neat things, though, like jumping to labels in other programs. 2679
Grammer / Grammer Feature Requests« on: December 29, 2011, 07:48:58 pm »
This is where y'all can drop your ideas and requests. I make no promises, but it is good to have everything in one place, right? So the first request was by yeong and that was to have a way to incorporate BASIC and Grammer together with Grammer 2 (it was possible in the first Grammer). So here is a program that should make that possible. Just start a line with .0:Asm(prgmGRAMMER and the code up until a Stop will be run as Grammer code. At the Stop, the code will be read as BASIC. You can do this as often as you like in a program, too
![]() 2680
Grammer / Re: Grammer Q&A« on: December 29, 2011, 07:27:11 pm »
Hmm, I am not sure what you mean... I think you mean allow BASIC and Grammer to be mixed? I could try to whip something up for you
![]() Also, I will make a Feature Request topic as you requested on IRC ![]() 2681
TI Z80 / Re: ASMDREAM - the TI-8X+ on-calc assembler« on: December 29, 2011, 07:16:12 pm »
I have always wanted to make an assembler syntax that would take B→A and translate that to 78 (for ld a,b) and other such basicised assembly. Now I can do that!
2682
Grammer / Re: Grammer 2-The APP« on: December 29, 2011, 01:46:05 pm »
Erm, that is not intentional in the least and I believe what it is doing is finding the RAM of the program (it isn't erased when archived).
2683
TI Z80 / Re: Map Editor (Grammer)« on: December 29, 2011, 01:44:09 pm »
Hmm, well I was planning on making a smoothscrolling tilemap engine built in, anyway. It will be nice to see the comparison of Grammer smooth scrolling versus Assembly smooth scrolling
![]() 2684
TI Z80 / Re: ASMDREAM - the TI-8X+ on-calc assembler« on: December 29, 2011, 01:42:36 pm »
Hmm, oops, I forgot that 0... Still, it works nicely! Also, maybe macros can have mandatory parentheses like bcall( ? That might help.
2685
TI Z80 / Re: ASMDREAM - the TI-8X+ on-calc assembler« on: December 29, 2011, 11:40:50 am »
I made my first ASMDREAM program! It was a simply "HOWDY WORLD" program, but I got it to work! I haven't even tried making my own macros, but I like that idea with LD A,?,B,?,C,?... Cool!
So what I have learned so far: -Instructions use a space first then the instruction -Labels do not start with a space -.db statements start with a . instead of a space I like it! Here is an example code: Code: [Select] →SRC
|
|