You might be right I was just thinking that first he would need to come up with the concept for how to do it but there are lots of ways to do things.  There might be some ways that are better in high level programming languages but very difficult in axe.

Hmmm you saw the papers.... I guess it is really then.  To be honest though I am not sure how buying omnimaga correlates to them trying to have a better relationship with the programming community.  Why would they want to buy omnimaga?  If they wanted to make developers happy they could fix some of the bugs in their os's that have been around for years, they could fix their nspire os so that it can support third party compiled programs without giving them os prevelages (linux perhaps?).  If they did that they would make a lot of developers happy.  The only reason that I can think of for ti to buy omnimaga is to control what is released by the community.  What do you guys think?  Why would ti actually want to buy omnimaga?

Hello I cannot seem to find the physics lib that (I think) buildboy made.  It was in the downloads section but since the site update I cannot find it let alone remember exactly what it is called.      The lib was simply an axe lib written in axe and (last time I checked) was discontinued but it seemed to be bug free to me.  Does anyone know what the lib is called?  (Or even have a link?)  Sorry for being vague but I have been looking for a long time with no success. 

This may already have been suggested but I really don't want to search through 200+ pages.  It would be really cool if axe supported compiling axe code into axioms.  When selecting which shell you want to compile for you would simply just need to select axiom.  A #AxiomSub(name, token-that-is-being-replaced, number-of-args) token could be added so that different functions could be added.  This would make so many more axioms show up for axe and also some libs like TheMachine002's glib and many others.  There is also the added bonus that any time you want to use a lib that is written in axe you don't have to wait as long when compiling the code because it is already precompiled.    By compiling in axioms in axe it means that code that is made for an old version of axe will still work (assuming the required structure of an axiom doesn't change).  I don't know how difficult it would be to implement so maybe it is not possible. (Runner?)


If we had this it may be very helpful to those who are new to axe because could just use tilemapping lib for example instead of having to learn a lot all at once.  Any thoughts anyone?

Welcome!    wish I had your teacher.    My economics teacher won't even let us touch a calculator. I could have finished the last test so much sooner if I didn't have to do long division.  (Seriously before then the last time I hadn't done long division for several years.)  At one point I wanted to play the piano but I gave up because....  actually I am not sure why I did. 

Use Wabbitemu and install the app to the emulated calc and then (somewhere but I forgot where) there is the ability to go to the beginning of where the app is stored in memory.  If it is not enabled by default there is an option to "decompile" the source from byte-codes into asm.  There won't be any comments of course but it is a start.  I have already wasted at lot of time with the app though trying to make the app think that I have bought the full version.  I actually got I to think I did too but it seems that they multiple protections in the code because the app would hang whenever I tried to do any calculus functions but would be fine with anything else.      Anyway... unless you're good at asm it is probably a waste of your time (it is almost embarrassing how much time I had wasted.)


I would have no problem paying about $30 for the app but for $100 I could get a used cx cas to do the work for me.... I bet they would actually make more money to if it were less.

This question has probably already been asked but... is there any way to run a line of basic code in axe?  If some other app like mirage os or doors cs is required I don't mind.  I want this so I can access basic functions that are added by apps like omnicalc and some others.

One way I have to protect my calc from being stolen is I modified the certificate of my calc using unsigned to display my name    The best part is that it is virtually impossible to modify (sending new os or clearing archive doesn't work).  The only thing is that too bad is that it only allows me to prove it is mine not necessarily get it back.     Out of curiosity, what kind of calculator was stolen from you?