I meant SMB original because of NESpire, will

chickendude: I just edited the hex using several tools like calcsys and then resigned the app. I don't have the source, but I have found it before!
I had NO idea MirageOS had so many features :O This is amazing! I took this app apart and didn't know about this stuff
The CAS sounds like it is just MathPrint for nSpires?

*NECROPOST* Is this project dead?

This will be exceedingly difficult for me to reproduce.

I'll work on compatibility lists when I get one. I love forming lists!

Thanks for welcoming me, Art_of_Camelot!

I shouldn't have dogged the 68k series so early on, then. I never went and took the time to explore the archives on ticalc, mostly because I never go there unless google directs me there with programs only found there. Apparently, the file hosting on that site is the preferred method of sharing things. I don't want a 68k series calc because I've got absolutely no money to speak of, ever, period. I want to get myself a nice calculator to continue my hobby, the nSpire seems the perfect fit. When I get a job that I can use for things other than things I need, I'll put a little money into the hobby if I still like calculators then. In that case, I will definitely get an 89, because obviously I was unaware how programmable they are!

I know enough about Axe that it's okay not to go in-depth. I use it to get something done quickly when Basic doesn't suit my needs. It's probably my favorite language I didn't know that Ion was executable natively, however, so I'll have to look into that because Ion rocks.

Few things: I either like to have a well documented calculator that everybody loves and knows lots about with lots of utilities written for it, or I like to be a pioneer in documentation for the calculator. I see that the 8x series and the 68k series have been beaten to death in that aspect. We don't know everything, but we know so much in comparison to any other calculator, I never have to test things for myself. I can just go to WikiTi.

The nSpire could always use someone like me to screw around and learn more about it! It's under-documented, but with a little push in the right direction, something could be done to make development a lot easier for it. The z80 series is the best all around, but I don't think the nSpire has been pushed to its limits like the 84+ has. So what makes a CAS better than a regular calculator?

Programming on the computer does, indeed, bother me. An oncalc program editor or even a simple text editor combined with a compiler would be the absolute LEAST I would require. Maybe some days I would write down an idea and then type it up on the computer, but I really prefer oncalc programming. The two long posts about the calculators were extremely helpful. I already know a lot about the Ti8x series, and have 4 members. A Ti82 of mine is hiding in my brother's room.

So the nSpire has some nice UI tricks that I can pick up to make MATH significantly easier, and unless I get serious about programming, those things are best left to the experts, whereas the Casio Prizm is great for the whole oncalc programming thing.
68k calculators will never enter my home unless I have every other kind of calculator out there. I do not, I repeat DO NOT, care about them. They are just underdocumented and nobody likes them for programming.

Axe isn't native! It requires to have it on calc, or even requires some shell of some kind, unless you compile fo noshell (which is the way to go unless speed or memory is a main concern.). But I see that variables work the same way on the CX CAS as they do in Axe. HELPFUL! What is the maximum size integer and most precise number that you can work with on each calculator?
I'm getting a lot of feedback from a lot of people!!

Thought: Use emulate a Gb ROM on a ti84+ emulated by a ti84+SE emulated by an nSpire on windows. just a thought!
So, that much progress has been made that quickly?